Vaccine causes anaphylactic shock

G

Gary K

New member
Banned
The UK government is warning people about the vaccine they are pushing on people that if they have a history of allergic reactions to not take the vaccine because two nurses, on the very first day of vaccinating the health care worker, went into anaphylactic shock on taking the vaccine.

Anaphylactic shock is life threatening. It's very a serious medical issue. Found out on the very first day of vaccinations. Think any more very serious issues are going to arise from this?

Plus Phizer now admits that 6 people died during the trials of their vaccine. Just makes you want to jump and run right down and demand to be vaccinated. Right? I mean. How safe can a product be? HCQ was held back from the American people because it was "dangerous" after being on the CDC's recommended drug list for decades, and millions of people take it on a daily basis world wide without any major side effects. But this product has already been killing people and the mass application of it hasn't even begun. Really builds trust doesn't it?

www.breitbart.com

UK's Warning After Two Suffer Adverse Reaction to Coronavirus Vaccine

A UK advisory committee has warned against people with a "significant" history of allergic reactions from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
Derf

Derf

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
The UK government is warning people about the vaccine they are pushing on people that if they have a history of allergic reactions to not take the vaccine because two nurses, on the very first day of vaccinating the health care worker, went into anaphylactic shock on taking the vaccine.

Anaphylactic shock is life threatening. It's very a serious medical issue. Found out on the very first day of vaccinations. Think any more very serious issues are going to arise from this?

Plus Phizer now admits that 6 people died during the trials of their vaccine. Just makes you want to jump and run right down and demand to be vaccinated. Right? I mean. How safe can a product be? HCQ was held back from the American people because it was "dangerous" after being on the CDC's recommended drug list for decades, and millions of people take it on a daily basis world wide without any major side effects. But this product has already been killing people and the mass application of it hasn't even begun. Really builds trust doesn't it?

www.breitbart.com

UK's Warning After Two Suffer Adverse Reaction to Coronavirus Vaccine

A UK advisory committee has warned against people with a "significant" history of allergic reactions from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
Click to expand...
I heard they used the meningitis vaccine as the placebo.
www.mcgill.ca

Placebos Used in Vaccine Trials Do Not Please Everyone

Against what does a vaccine need to be tested in the context of a clinical trial? The answer that pops immediately to mind is “a placebo.” In the medical sciences, things get compared to placebos to see if they have inherent potency or if it’s all about the theatre and natural circumstances...
www.mcgill.ca
 
Last edited:
C

chair

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
Anaphylactic shock is life threatening. It's very a serious medical issue. Found out on the very first day of vaccinations. Think any more very serious issues are going to arise from this?
Click to expand...
None of this is a surprise. A small percentage of people will have a bad reaction to the vaccine. Emphasis on "small". It happens with every vaccine. This will protect millions from a life-threatening disease Go get vaccinated!
 
Derf

Derf

Well-known member
chair said:
None of this is a surprise. A small percentage of people will have a bad reaction to the vaccine. Emphasis on "small". It happens with every vaccine. This will protect millions from a life-threatening disease Go get vaccinated!
Click to expand...
Protect millions from a hyped up disease that can be treated fairly easily if doctors are allowed to do so.

Who wants to take a politicized vaccine that skipped normal vaccine animal testing, that temporarily reduces the chance of catching a politicized disease?
 
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
chair said:
None of this is a surprise. A small percentage of people will have a bad reaction to the vaccine. Emphasis on "small". It happens with every vaccine. This will protect millions from a life-threatening disease Go get vaccinated!
Click to expand...
Well since 50 million people in the US alone have allergies I would say this is no insignificant number of people who are at risk of severe health problems coming from this vaccine. It isn't a small percentage of the population. Its a significant portion of the US population: approximately 1/6th of the population has allergies.

Ah, what's 50 million people to you. It's simply a drop in the ocean. Who cares about how many people have a major risk of death from the vaccination. Get vaccinated, and if you die, who cares? Yeah, it sounds like leftist ideology.
 
C

chair

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
Well since 50 million people in the US alone have allergies I would say this is no insignificant number of people who are at risk of severe health problems coming from this vaccine. It isn't a small percentage of the population. Its a significant portion of the US population: approximately 1/6th of the population has allergies.

Ah, what's 50 million people to you. It's simply a drop in the ocean. Who cares about how many people have a major risk of death from the vaccination. Get vaccinated, and if you die, who cares? Yeah, it sounds like leftist ideology.
Click to expand...
50 million people aren't going to go into shock. It's a rare reaction.
This is Science and Statistics- not ideology. Except in your head.
 
Yorzhik

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
chair said:
50 million people aren't going to go into shock. It's a rare reaction.
This is Science and Statistics- not ideology. Except in your head.
Click to expand...
What is the percentage? 1%? That's five hundred thousand people. How about 1%? that's fifty thousand people. And that is young people. Do note that it has been determined that the overall rate of death has not changed at all. A pandemic should include excess deaths. But there are not any until you include young people. So the vaccine turns out to be worse then the disease.
 
C

chair

Well-known member
Yorzhik said:
What is the percentage? 1%? That's five hundred thousand people. How about 1%? that's fifty thousand people. And that is young people. Do note that it has been determined that the overall rate of death has not changed at all. A pandemic should include excess deaths. But there are not any until you include young people. So the vaccine turns out to be worse then the disease.
Click to expand...
The health organizations are being extremely careful, and you read this caution as "see! the vaccine is deadly."
 
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
chair said:
The health organizations are being extremely careful, and you read this caution as "see! the vaccine is deadly."
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm really reading danger into this. The UK is deploying resuscitation centers whereever vaccines are being administered. Yeah, no danger there. We just have to be ready to save your life if you come to us take this vaccine. Nothing deadly about that. That's called a big time side effect. One so big that even a year or so ago nobody could even have imagined that kind of medical care having to be immediately available just to take a vaccine.

www.breitbart.com

UK Rolls Out 'Resuscitation Facilities' at Corona Vaccine Centres

The UK will require "resuscitation facilities" in COVID vaccine centres after two healthcare workers suffered reactions to the virus.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

Yeah, this is really safe. And in Australia people are testing positive for HIV after they take the vaccine. The coronavirus actually has the HIV delivery system in it. That's been known for many months. And now people are testing positive for HIV after taking that particular vaccine. Oh, the media will tell you these are all false positives, but who is that wants to take that chance? The media lies so often it's pretty much a guarantee that the false positive narrative is a lie.
 
C

chair

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
Yeah, I'm really reading danger into this. The UK is deploying resuscitation centers whereever vaccines are being administered. Yeah, no danger there. We just have to be ready to save your life if you come to us take this vaccine. Nothing deadly about that. That's called a big time side effect. One so big that even a year or so ago nobody could even have imagined that kind of medical care having to be immediately available just to take a vaccine.

www.breitbart.com

UK Rolls Out 'Resuscitation Facilities' at Corona Vaccine Centres

The UK will require "resuscitation facilities" in COVID vaccine centres after two healthcare workers suffered reactions to the virus.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

Yeah, this is really safe. And in Australia people are testing positive for HIV after they take the vaccine. The coronavirus actually has the HIV delivery system in it. That's been known for many months. And now people are testing positive for HIV after taking that particular vaccine. Oh, the media will tell you these are all false positives, but who is that wants to take that chance? The media lies so often it's pretty much a guarantee that the false positive narrative is a lie.
Click to expand...
Again, you are taking caution as a sign of total failure. But hey- all this fits into your superior "knowledge" of what is Really Going ON (TM). Please, come back here in a few months, and report to me how many people were killed by the vaccine. Time will tell.
 
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
chair said:
Again, you are taking caution as a sign of total failure. But hey- all this fits into your superior "knowledge" of what is Really Going ON (TM). Please, come back here in a few months, and report to me how many people were killed by the vaccine. Time will tell.
Click to expand...
LOL. You're like the pot calling the kettle black when you make the assumptions you make. And you're also creating a fallacy. I am simply pointing out the dangers that scientists and governments have already recognized. Australia stopped using their vaccine. The UK is requiring resuscitation centers wherever vaccines are given. Those are facts. If the dangers were not exceeding high none of those actions would have been taken. And they've taken those actions in less than a week of dispensing the vaccines. Those are serious issues. The fact that I bring them out an publish them here angers you. Why? You want those dangers covered up? Why?
 
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
A really good video from a talk on vaccines. It includes a portion of a talk on the scientist who was instrumental in the production on vaccines. BTW, he's highly critical of how vaccines are being used and misrepresentation of their effectiveness and their safety.

 
C

chair

Well-known member
ffreeloader said:
Australia stopped using their vaccine.
Click to expand...
True- but they're going to use other vaccines instead.
Note that the vaccine didn't cause HIV- it caused false positive tests.

A promising Australian candidate for a coronavirus vaccine has been abandoned after trial participants returned false HIV positive results.
Australia had previously agreed to buy 51 million doses of the vaccine being developed by Australian firm CSL and the University of Queensland (UQ).
The government said orders of other vaccines would now fill the shortfall.
www.bbc.com

Covid: Australian vaccine abandoned over false HIV response

Trials of the Australian vaccine returned false-positive HIV tests, but did not harm participants.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
 
way 2 go

way 2 go

Well-known member
link.

An Austrian parliamentary member demonstrated the defectiveness of the government’s Covid-19 tests by showing how a glass of coke yields a positive result.
 
JudgeRightly

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
G

Gary K

New member
Banned
The latest news on PCR tests is that when what is called the "cycle threshold" (ct) of the test is too high 97% of the people testing positive will be false positives. So how can "scientists" predict waves of infections? All that has to be done to increase the number of positive tests is raise the CT of the tests. Simple as that. Raise the ct to 40 and basically everyone who gets tested will test positive. Lower the ct to 20 and the number of "cases" drops dramatically because at that point there are very few false positive tests. Thus we have "waves" of infections created by simply varying the ct of the PCR test.

thevaccinereaction.org

Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted

When PCR tests are adjusted, the number of coronavirus cases drop dramatically.
thevaccinereaction.org thevaccinereaction.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top