Nope.Wow! Slanderous. Twice!!
A little much, don't you think?
Nope.Wow! Slanderous. Twice!!
A little much, don't you think?
You do realize there is a difference between teaching a redemptive principle and having the principle be redemptive...right?
Nope.
Find the holes in Shawn's 15 points - you can't. The guy is right.
If you can get past his version of the Hybrid nastiness toward anyone who holds a different view :chuckle:
https://forwhatsaiththescriptures.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/acts-9-28-hybrid-theology/
Should you bother to get off your pedestal, and read his 15 points, I have a few more you Hybrids are off on :chuckle:
Even if that were true, it's irrelevant for a story that doesn't exit.She is TOO literal in her sense of some passages, and not literal ENOUGH in her sense of other passages.
Danoh perceives himself as the Godfather of who is a real MADist and who is not, and what can be considered biblically literal and what is not.If I were to answer a fool according to his folly, you'd be getting an earful about now.
Be that as it may, I'm not sure why you would think I would want to follow in your man-following footsteps, but you are in error as usual.
Danoh perceives himself as the Godfather of who is a real MADist and who is not, and what can be considered biblically literal and what is not.
His perception of himself is about as deluded as his perception of others.
Danoh be Danoh.
Oh wait, I forgot the chuckle smile.
:chuckle:
There we go.
He'll be along shortly to give another lecture that not all people think alike.I know, poor guy. I'm afraid he's convinced he's God's gift to us all.
He'll be along shortly to give another lecture that not all people think alike.
If I were to answer a fool according to his folly, you'd be getting an earful about now.
Be that as it may, I'm not sure why you would think I would want to follow in your man-following footsteps, but you are in error as usual.
I know. Did you notice he called me an Acts 28? Do you think that's a complement?
He'll be along shortly to give another lecture that not all people think alike.
Get your heart out of the gutter of this world.
She is a sister in the Lord; not some lost woman in hot pants; you fool.
Romans 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. 12:3 For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
:doh:
Right on cue. :chuckle:He'll be along shortly to give another lecture that not all people think alike.
Leave it to you to find a way to hold to your ALMOST 28er, Acts 9/Acts 28 Hybrid, Alt-Mad holes - 60 pages, 15 of your Hybrid's assertion's carefully examined and found - full of holes :chuckle:
I'm just a [FONT="]wretched, spiteful, straight-razor totin' woman.Just about your Alt-Mad club's every other post is basically a dissimulation of one kind or another.
Case in point - you and what's her name wwere recently praising STP and Nick about how much you have learned from them - which STP has said already said is based on commentaries by Hybrid based writers and teachers (Moore; Brackin, et al):chuckle:
It's nicer than some other things he calls you.I know. Did you notice he called me an Acts 28? Do you think that's a complement?
Just about your Alt-Mad club's every other post is basically a dissimulation of one kind or another.
Case in point - you and what's her name wwere recently praising STP and Nick about how much you have learned from them - which STP has said already said is based on commentaries by Hybrid based writers and teachers (Moore; Brackin, et al):chuckle:
Oh no! Not the CLUB!!!!!Just about your Alt-Mad club's
Danoh likes to write hybrid commentaries about hybrid commentaries.Not commentaries, Bible studies.
Faith cometh by hearing...
For someone who claims to know the Jewish religion so well, you sure fall short of the facts. The blood sacrifices never atoned for sins....they were a temporary reprieve offered by God to appease man's conscience, until Christ came and gave his LIFE on the cross.
And if you call me "honeygirl" again or anything like it, I will report you.