Right Divider
Body part
MAD denies neither of those things, Mr. StrawmanBeater.Yet ,Paul said others were in Christ before him and Galatians says Paul preached the same faith he once sought to destroy. Proving that MAD is wrong.
MAD denies neither of those things, Mr. StrawmanBeater.Yet ,Paul said others were in Christ before him and Galatians says Paul preached the same faith he once sought to destroy. Proving that MAD is wrong.
"In Christ" and "in the church which is His body" are NOT identical.MAD says Paul was first in the B.O.C. yet Paul says others were in Christ before him. I will stay with what Paul said.
So you think that there was previously a "salvation through the law"? The law never saved ANYONE.Yep, before they met and knew Paul had changed they had heard of Paul only NOW they knew Paul was changed by Jesus as Paul preached the "same faith" he once sought to destroy. What was the same faith Paul once sought to destroy why that would be the Gospel of grace NOT salvation through the law.
Only because MAD is in error, and it does not take a genius to see their error.
MAD is a result of men following men and not following God.
I didn't deny that Jesus ascended with a flesh body.
However, you claimed Jesus returns with a flesh body (corporeal form).
There is nothing in Acts 1 that suggests so. The point about Jesus returning in "like manner" is not about His flesh, but about the way in which He returns. Meaning, the world didn't see it, or know about it. Which is why the Bible says He would return like a thief in the night.
Demon Tet. asserts that the Lord Jesus Christ is not a man right now-that is Preterism-they have to assert that satanic "doctrine," to fit their "invention."
MAD is a result of men following men and not following God.
I didn't deny that Jesus ascended with a flesh body.
However, you claimed Jesus returns with a flesh body (corporeal form).
There is nothing in Acts 1 that suggests so. The point about Jesus returning in "like manner" is not about His flesh, but about the way in which He returns. Meaning, the world didn't see it, or know about it. Which is why the Bible says He would return like a thief in the night.
I'm really perplexed at how this tet person has now admitted that Jesus ascended in Corpreal form.
According to their stance, the Angel in Acts 1 lied.
Jesus never physically returned, and never will physically return to planet earth after He ascended to Heaven.
.And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him. However, He never touched planet earth, and when this event was over, He then sat on the throne in Heaven NOT on planet earth.
Correct, and thanks for making it clear that it was the Roman army that was His return.
The Roman army destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD. That is what Jesus meant when He said He will return.
:rotfl:It looks like I have found yet another Darby Follower who lives in denial.
Dispensationalism did NOT exist before Darby invented it in 1830.
There is not one trace of Dispensationalism found being taught by anyone before Darby in 1830.
The Flood came like a thief in the night too. You don't Spiritualized the flood too, do you?
vs.
.
"Everyone" that saw Him, according to Craigie, was Josephus, and Wikipedia. Wait....According to Craigie the Clown, he did not return physically, but all of Jerusalem saw him.. And, according to Craigie the Clown, signs are invisible...
Wait...
Vs.
"Tet is a preterist that believes Christ already returned in 70 AD viathe Roman Army."-Tambora, on another TOL thread
Hebrews 9:28 KJV
So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
Craigie the Clown: The Roman army was looking for him-that is the "them" above. My infallible AD 70/Pteterist "teachers" taught me,like Hank Hanegraaf, from whom I copy'npaste/spam.
Shazam, Gomer!
Preterist Gomer Tet...from the army of the ignorant.
I know, I know....Darby...Bullinger....You follow the teachings/inventions/theories of fallible men, unlike me, as I, Craigie, follow the teachings of infallible men, or women, or the pope....vision of a teenage girl.....Darby.....Bullinger.....figurative.....hy perbole...fulfilled AD 65, or 66, 0r 70, 0r 666......No one taught dispensationalism, until Darby, and no one taught that the earth was round, until, and no one taught of the concept of "God the Father," until this "Jesus" I reference, in disrespect, flipping the bird at him, came around, and the idea that he will be King on the planet earth, ..........and Pluto was a planet, at one time, as when you discover objective truth, determines if it is, in fact, objective truth, you see, well, uh, urr, and thus, the Lord Jesus Christ was not really the Lord God, until I, Gomer Tet., discovered it, you see.....
Not one scripture asserts that the Lord Jesus Christ lost His glorified flesh and bone body, after He returned to the third heaven, as Craigie the Clown-ette speculates, makes up.
That is his MO, "ministry" on this site....habitual lying, contradictions, hypocrisy, sophistry....This Tet person is extremely contradictory of themselves. They remind me of a bible verse,
Ephesians 4:14 Then we will no longer be immature like children. We won't be tossed and blown about by every wind of new teaching. We will not be influenced when people try to trick us with lies so clever they sound like the truth.
That is his MO, "ministry" on this site....habitual lying, contradictions, hypocrisy, sophistry....
I thought his ministry was to make us feel like goons, Sam?
Who are you, Gertrude? The Count of Monte Cristo?
Is it true that you dated Mrs. Mondello, and taught Larry how to play the stocks?
Is it true that you dated Mrs. Mondello, and taught Larry how to play the stocks?
Angels Lie?
The Flood came like a thief in the night too. You don't Spiritualized the flood too, do you?