Two sets of rules for the Lib establishment led to body slam 'who cares?'

jgarden

BANNED
Banned

Two sets of rules for the Lib establishment led to body slam 'who cares?'


I hope our conservative "friends" won't expect us to sing "kumbaya" with them a year from now when the House, Senate and Special Council Reports expose how Trump and his "motley crew" tried to sell-out America to the Russians!
 

ClimateSanity

New member
Well, no I didn't, as it's about as lucid, logical and impressive as what my cat has just unburdened itself of in it's litter tray, but hey. You could have written such a piece I've no doubt!

:)
It certainly is Artie. That's just your refusal to look at the conservative point of view. It's like putting a crucifix in front of a vampire.
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
Two sets of rules for the Lib establishment led to body slam 'who cares?'

Judgement Day for "The Donald" and his "motley crew" of Russian sympathizers is rapidly approaching = Trump supporters would be well advised to book themselves a one-way ticket to the Kremlin!
 

ClimateSanity

New member
Two sets of rules for the Lib establishment led to body slam 'who cares?'

Judgement Day for "The Donald" and his "motley crew" of Russian sympathizers is rapidly approaching = Trump supporters would be well advised to book themselves a one-way ticket to the Kremlin!
What are you talking about? There is zero evidence.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
It certainly is Artie. That's just your refusal to look at the conservative point of view. It's like putting a crucifix in front of a vampire.

I'll look at any point of view provided it's rational and not some self impressed bunch of stereotypical crap. Whole OP is just yet another far right load of drivel. There are conservatives who can actually have an intelligent conversation and I've enjoyed several on here. Far removed from the hyper zealous brand that you represent.
 

intojoy

BANNED
Banned
I'll look at any point of view provided it's rational and not some self impressed bunch of stereotypical crap. Whole OP is just yet another far right load of drivel. There are conservatives who can actually have an intelligent conversation and I've enjoyed several on here. Far removed from the hyper zealous brand that you represent.

Ok Muhammad


Sent from my iPhone using TOL
 

rexlunae

New member
I know it’s theoretically wrong for a Republican candidate to smack around an annoying liberal journalist, but that still doesn’t mean that I care. Our ability to care is a finite resource, and, in the vast scheme of things, millions of us have chosen to devote exactly none of it toward caring enough to engage in fussy self-flagellation because of what happened to Slappy La Brokenshades.

Sorry, not sorry.

And that’s not a good thing, not by any measure, but it is a*real*thing. Liberals have chosen to coarsen our culture. Their validation and encouragement of raw hate, their flouting of laws (Hi leakers! Hi Hillary!) and their utter refusal to accept democratic outcomes they disapprove of have consequences. What is itself so surprising is how liberals and their media rentboyz are so surprised to find that we normals are beginning to feel about them the way they feel about us – and that we’re starting to act on it. If you hate us, guess what?

We’re going to start hating you right back.


Cue the boring moralizing and sanctimonious whimpering of the femmy, bow-tied, submissive branch of conservatism whose obsolete members were shocked to find themselves left behind by the masses to whom these geeks’ sinecures were not the most important objective of the movement. This is where they sniff, “We’re better than that,” and one has to ask ,“Who’s we?” Because, by nature, people are*not*better than that. They are not designed to sit back and take it while they are abused, condescended to, and told by a classless ruling class that there are now two sets of rules and – guess what? –the old rules are only going to be enforced against them.

We don’t like the new rules – I’d sure prefer a society where no one was getting attacked, having walked through the ruins of a country that took that path – but we normals didn’t choose the new rules. The left did. It gave us Ferguson, Middlebury College, Berkeley, and “Punch a Nazi” – which, conveniently for the left, translates as “punch normals.” And many of us have had personal experiences with this New Hate – jobs lost, hassles, and worse. Some scumbags at an anti-Trump rally attacked my friend and horribly injured his dog. His freaking dog!

So when we start to adopt their rules, they’re shocked? Have they ever met human beings before? It’s not a surprise. It’s inevitable.

Team Fredocon, when they aren’t, “Oh well, I never!-ing” about Trump and his uncouth supporters, moan about the threat of “Whataboutism,” the tendency for people to explain their sub-optimal behavior by asking, “What about so-and-so? He did the same thing and you didn’t care.” But while “whataboutism” may be a logical fallacy, it’s still a devastatingly compelling argument.

Humans – especially normal Americans – won’t tolerate a double standard. But double standards apply all the time to liberals – they do it and it’s fine, but we do it and it’s Armageddon. The same jerks screaming for O‘Reilly’s scalp worship Bill Clinton and his drunken, perv-enabling pseudo-wife.

Or take the Trump-Russia black hole of idiocy – please. Remember how Obama whispered to the Russkies, “I'll have more flexibility after election” and that was cool? But – according to an anonymous source reading a bar tab over the phone to some credulous WaPo hack – one of Trump’s relatives ordered a vodka once and it’s TREASON TREASON TREASON!!!!!!

It certainly applies to, “What about when they*hit conservatives with a lock in a sockand the liberal media didn’t care?” Yeah, what about that? Where was the sackcloth and ashes act from Schumer, Pelosi, and Felonia von Pantsuit when our side was being bloodied and beaten? There wasn’t one, because the left*supports*us getting bloodied and beaten. It*likes*the zesty zing of violence. It makes them feel big and tough and edgy, except that it starts being a heck of a lot less fun when we right-wingers start adopting the same rules and punching back.

Did you plagiarize this whole post?

https://townhall.com/columnists/kur...ere-starting-to-hate-them-right-back-n2332712
 

ClimateSanity

New member
By theoretically I mean legally and morally? No. I mean wrong. That's what I clearly stated.

Invite violence into our political process? No. That was introduced into the process by your side from the start of the campaign.
 

ClimateSanity

New member
Artie. You unintentionally gave me a compliment. You think I wrote something that lucid and logical and impressive? My English is not that good, nor my rhetorical skills. Thanks for that dude. Let me find the actual author and give credit like I'm supposed to do.....me

It was written by Kurt Schlicter for Townhall...me


Did you plagiarize this whole post?

I copied and pasted the whole OP ,yes, and then a few minutes later, gave credit.

What do you want to do about it?
 

rexlunae

New member
By theoretically I mean legally and morally? No. I mean wrong. That's what I clearly stated.

You (by which I mean the article you ripped off) said it was "theoretically wrong". To people who speak English, that questions the wrongness.

Invite violence into our political process? No. That was introduced into the process by your side from the start of the campaign.

Neither side has been perfect, but generally I think people are responsible for their own actions. The Republican establishment is the only organized, mainstream political movement embracing violence as a means to power. Just last week, one of their own assaulted a reporter, and the party establishment gently chided him, but still embraced him.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
You (by which I mean the article you ripped off) said it was "theoretically wrong". To people who speak English, that questions the wrongness.



Neither side has been perfect, but generally I think people are responsible for their own actions. The Republican establishment is the only organized, mainstream political movement embracing violence as a means to power. Just last week, one of their own assaulted a reporter, and the party establishment gently chided him, but still embraced him.
While colleges can't have a conservative speaker on campus without full scale rioting and beatings.
 

ClimateSanity

New member
You (by which I mean the article you ripped off) said it was "theoretically wrong". To people who speak English, that questions the wrongness.



Neither side has been perfect, but generally I think people are responsible for their own actions. The Republican establishment is the only organized, mainstream political movement embracing violence as a means to power. Just last week, one of their own assaulted a reporter, and the party establishment gently chided him, but still embraced him.
Why does it matter to you that I forgot to attribute the article in the OP? Especially when I cleared it up later on?
 

ClimateSanity

New member
You (by which I mean the article you ripped off) said it was "theoretically wrong". To people who speak English, that questions the wrongness.



Neither side has been perfect, but generally I think people are responsible for their own actions. The Republican establishment is the only organized, mainstream political movement embracing violence as a means to power. Just last week, one of their own assaulted a reporter, and the party establishment gently chided him, but still embraced him.
To people who speak English? That questions the wrongness? That doesn't even make sense in English.
 

rexlunae

New member
Why does it matter to you that I forgot to attribute the article in the OP? Especially when I cleared it up later on?

Even with attribution, copying and pasting an entire article is dubious. This is a discussion forum, and the article is sibject to copyright, which subjects TOL to potential liability. The general guidance is to provide a link and copy the salient bits with your own thoughts added. You know, an actual discussion. The fact that you don't even appear to comprehend the language the article used is just embarrassing for you.
 
Top