I asked for a qualifying of who ALL are. You using the word "all" is serious error so you must have a reason that you believe "ALL"means ALL. Perhaps it is a Catholic thing and you can explain?
all means everyone
I asked for a qualifying of who ALL are. You using the word "all" is serious error so you must have a reason that you believe "ALL"means ALL. Perhaps it is a Catholic thing and you can explain?
Romans 5:1 is truth
You do believe the truth do you not?
It is not God's blame if a believer does not believe that.
It is there for believers to read and learn and believe and live
Is it "too good to be true?" it is good because it is true.
Take that to your own heart because you are in error.
I don't read much from you because of your non-understanding. However, I take it your are of some sort of 'religious' pentecostal persuasion. Are you and if so, which "stripe"? It is difficult to identify as denomination.
You say I am in error.
Yet you cannot show me how, why is that?
are we all justified?
It was offered to all. Be reconciled to God. He has paid the price for you sin if you will only accept that gift and put your trust in him.
Romans 5
18 Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life.
Just as you do not have to attend a party that you were invited to, you do not have to accept this gift. You can stand before him in judgment and see if he is a corrupt judge or a righteous one. I promise, you will not like it.
It was offered to all. Be reconciled to God. He has paid the price for you sin if you will only accept that gift and put your trust in him.
Better stated, I should have written, I have no desire to because of the fear of getting entangled in your convoluted thinking that has a non-ending when all summed up __ or worse. In other words I won't entertain you in your profitless discussions of futility, nor let you entertain me, even for laughs..
. . . . motivation for rejecting it being the main objective in judgment.
how do you accept that gift?
So, because I believe Romans 5:1, you choose not to?
how do you accept that gift?
It was offered to all. Be reconciled to God. He has paid the price for you sin if you will only accept that gift and put your trust in him.
Romans 10:9-10
Most people on this website, who take scripture seriously, that is, desire to do what is pleasing to God, have accepted that gift.
That would include you. of that I have no doubt.
Many however, have not opened it, they are overwhelmed by and studying the wrapping, not realizing the gift inside is even more wonderful than the wrapping.
You are assuming it means there are two different gospels instead of one gospel to two very different audiences, as I previously explained. Are you aware the word gospel is only used once in the verse?
ἀλλὰ τοὐναντίον, ἰδόντες ὅτι πεπίστευμαι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον τῆς ἀκροβυστίας, καθὼς Πέτρος τῆς περιτομῆς―
I explained to you how the verse is about one gospel effecting the circumcised and uncircumcised differently. Here's the NASB translation:
Galatians 2:7 But on the contrary, seeing that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised.
And it should be noted that neither Peter nor Paul were sent exclusively to Jews and Gentiles respectively (eg. Acts 9:15; Acts 15:7). That should effect how we read Galatians 2:7.
What do you believe the alleged two gospels are exactly, and how are they different?
Question for you my friend....Why would God send Paul to Jerusalem by special revelation to make known his gospel to the twelve if they already knew it and were the first to receive it?
did Jesus change His mind?
or
were the apostles ignoring the gentiles?
How about neither
okay answer your own question?
I asked ELo this in another thread, but I will ask it here as well for Cross Reference...
Question for you my friend....Why would God send Paul to Jerusalem by special revelation to make known his gospel to the twelve if they already knew it and were the first to receive it?