11 days? :rotfl: Spicer is laughing at this one too. The only thing Scaramucci managed to communicate was the ineptness of this administration.
11 days? :rotfl: Spicer is laughing at this one too. The only thing Scaramucci managed to communicate was the ineptness of this administration.
Scaramouche (Scaramucci):
noun
1.
a stock character in commedia dell'arte and farce who is a cowardly braggart, easily beaten and frightened.
2.
(lowercase) a rascal or scamp.
How so? What firewalls?
No crime. Have you looked up what it takes to rise to the level of criminal obstruction? Keep dreaming barbWhy Jeff Sessions Won’t Give a Straight Answer
The attorney general and his deputy aren’t dodging questions to protect Trump. They’re protecting themselves.
Now, as special counsel Robert Mueller escalates his inquiry into possible obstruction of justice, there’s an extra reason to suspect that Trump is guilty: The two lawyers with whom the president collaborated in the firing, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, aren’t vouching for Trump’s innocence. They’re giving answers and nonanswers that seem carefully crafted to allow for the possibility that they were used.
Trump’s original story, distilled in his May 9 termination letter, was that he fired Comey based on written recommendations received that day from Rosenstein and Sessions. That wasn’t true, and Rosenstein’s anger at being portrayed as the prime mover quickly forced the White House to backpedal. In his NBC interview, Trump admitted that he had already made up his mind by May 8, a day before the memos were written.
Since then, Rosenstein and Sessions have gone further. Testifying on Tuesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sessions said Trump had directly solicited the memos. Rosenstein, in a statement to Congress on May 18, denied that his memo was “a survey of FBI morale or performance” or “a statement of reasons to justify a for-cause termination,” as Trump and the White House had implied. Both men articulated arguments against Comey that were completely different from, and essentially contrary to, Trump’s public beefs with the director. They also noted that their arguments against Comey were long-standing, which leaves Trump to explain why he suddenly adopted them...If Mueller concludes that Trump fired Comey over the Russia investigation, nothing Sessions or Rosenstein said in their hearings will turn out to be false. Sessions denied any collusion with Russia, and Rosenstein said he’s leaving such questions to Mueller. But on the question of whether Trump fired Comey to obstruct justice, and whether the president orchestrated a cover story to conceal that obstruction, the two men Trump enlisted are taking care not to vouch for his innocence. Maybe that’s because they can’t. Maybe they know they were used, and they don’t want to get caught in a web of lies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ssions_and_rosenstein_are_being_so_cagey.html
Sessions is very clearly avoiding anything that might pull him into an indictment.
What can he do about N. Korea that would meet with your approvalTrump Totally Embarrasses Himself While Trying To Talk Tough On North KoreaDonald Trump was trying to talk tough to North Korea, but his response to a reporter’s question revealed a president without a plan who doesn’t appear to have the slightest clue of how to handle a looming potential crisis.
Trump said, “We’ll handle North Korea. We’ll be able to handle North Korea. It will be handled. We handle everything.”
North Korea recently tested missiles that could reach major US cities, and Trump’s response is nothing more than, ‘it will be handled.”
The problem is that this administration hasn’t handled anything. How is Trump going to handle N. Korea? What’s the plan? What does Trump even mean by “handling?” Trump can’t talk about North Korea in the same way that people talk about going to the grocery store and seriously believe that people will accept this as fine. Presidents need to have strategies, plans, and goals. Trump appears to have none of these. We’ll handle it can mean anything from sanctions to an invasion.
The President’s response was embarrassing, and if Pyongyang is watching, they are laughing at Trump, because this is an expert in the art of self-humiliation.
Worth noting that Trump's dropped to 39% approval rating in the latest Rasmussen poll. Rasmussen.
Take up residence?What can he do about N. Korea that would meet with your approval
Trump Totally Embarrasses Himself While Trying To Talk Tough On North KoreaDonald Trump was trying to talk tough to North Korea, but his response to a reporter’s question revealed a president without a plan who doesn’t appear to have the slightest clue of how to handle a looming potential crisis.
Trump said, “We’ll handle North Korea. We’ll be able to handle North Korea. It will be handled. We handle everything.”
North Korea recently tested missiles that could reach major US cities, and Trump’s response is nothing more than, ‘it will be handled.”
The problem is that this administration hasn’t handled anything. How is Trump going to handle N. Korea? What’s the plan? What does Trump even mean by “handling?” Trump can’t talk about North Korea in the same way that people talk about going to the grocery store and seriously believe that people will accept this as fine. Presidents need to have strategies, plans, and goals. Trump appears to have none of these. We’ll handle it can mean anything from sanctions to an invasion.
The President’s response was embarrassing, and if Pyongyang is watching, they are laughing at Trump, because this is an expert in the art of self-humiliation.
Worth noting that Trump's dropped to 39% approval rating in the latest Rasmussen poll. Rasmussen.
Here is a prime example of Fake News attacks on Trump which have been regurgitated for the past 18 months. Trump did not mock the disability of the man
Take up residence?
You weren't imagining the laughter and applause supporting Trump's harmless statement. That's how the average officer feels, the PC police had to say something against it to appease the haters like youWhat an embarrassment he is, but he gets the front page of the news and the police rebuttal or apology for our drunken uncle president gets the back page. I am glad the police stood up for right but would have missed that had you not posted this. I would have been left with the imagine that the police were in agreement by their laughter and applause.
Trump knows how to get crowds to "agree with him" when in REALITY that don't. Why do they call him and his ilk reality stars? It's a horrid reality.