glorydaz
Well-known member
This will be Trump's legacy. Maybe even more than Putin and Stormy Daniels.
In the liberal's dreams. :rotfl:
This will be Trump's legacy. Maybe even more than Putin and Stormy Daniels.
This will be Trump's legacy.
This will be Trump's legacy. Maybe even more than Putin and Stormy Daniels.
It's a historical cover for sure - of the worst president this country has ever seen.
This will be Trump's legacy. Maybe even more than Putin and Stormy Daniels.
He certainly put that toddler in her place!
He certainly put that toddler in her place!
The little girl’s father is thankful the little girl is safe with her mom and proud she represents the children who were less fortunate.
As news emerged Thursday that the mother and child were not separated, conservative media jumped on the story, portraying it as evidence of “fake news” surrounding the Trump administration’s immigration policies.
It was the most prominent story on the home page of the conservative news outlet Breitbart, which called it a “fake news photo.” Donald Trump Jr. retweeted the story Thursday night.
Varela pushed back against the portrayals of his daughter’s story, saying it should not cast doubt on the “human rights violations” taking place at the border.
“This is the case for my daughter, but it is not the case for 2,000 children that were separated from their parents,” Varela said.
At least 2,500 migrant children have been separated from their parents at the border since May 5.
Varela said he felt “proud” that his daughter has “represented the subject of immigration” and helped propel changes in policy. But he asked that Trump “put his hand on his heart.”
He hopes that U.S. officials will grant asylum to his wife and daughter, he said.
Asked whether he would also like to come to the United States, he said, “Of course, someday.”
back in in a few with the link.
So you just found out it was all fake news. Waiting for one more oops.... news retraction.
No wonder President Trump keeps on repeating 'fake news'.
When is Time going to retract, not on page 32 with almost invisible tiny letters at the bottom of the page so no one can see it, but retract on a front page to show that they are a veritable magazine?
No. Not fake news at all. Do you understand what political commentary is? If the cover had been drawn as a political cartoon would you have had the same reaction?
The fact is you're more worried about the Time cover than you are about the little children she represents.