Is that why you were banned more often back then?
You also didn't suck up to them like you do to the mods now.
crow was my bud
nin and poly and I butted heads
a lot
I still liked them
it's a guy thing, I guess :idunno:
Is that why you were banned more often back then?
You also didn't suck up to them like you do to the mods now.
crow was my bud
nin and poly and I butted heads
a lot
I still liked them
it's a guy thing, I guess :idunno:
On who should be the new mod. :doh:An opinion on what?
That works.
I don't have a wish-list but if you are asking about what I think of the posts that get reported, yes I do think the report feature is over-used. :idunno:
I'm a guy too. :noid:
Can I vote ?
I know the perfect place. :up:
Okay, you made claims about how a cursory analysis of reports and mod action would tell you something about a poster in consideration for potential mod status, stressing the notion that being right was of preeminent importance here.What, again?
That's a nice attempt to magically make beliefs the issue, but again, what a mod does is enforce the rules. Those rules are understandable and I've seen mods with different triggers manage it over the years I've been here.They need to exercise that power in keeping with the beliefs of what has been established. Divergence in belief makes for division in leadership.
Given I've prospered under the system what am I supposed to be crying about? It's simply the truth and one that impacts your approach, the one you can't and didn't rationally defend with that block quote and subsequent memory loss.:allsmile:
It doesn't call itself fair or right, so why should I and why would you?You're not going to call it fair or right?
Ah, threats of doom, but no reason. Nah. What will happen is what happened with you, or name calling maybe. Because if you approach me rationally it won't go well for you. You're smart enough. It isn't accidental that you're doing memory loss exercises and declarations backed by vague threats instead of arguing the points.Well, you can call it not fair and all you'll get is mocked. You can call it not right and get yourself smacked by the truth.
So you don't like English now? Okay, that dig aside, the truth is that the standard of enforcement turns in part on who is making the complaint and that's not an expression of right, it's an expression of power. It's like the thing hard right wingers complain about with the government, but without all that voting.Truth is that is is right for the mods to behave as they do and to limit access to the functions of the mods as they do.
It wasn't a complicated answer. A mod enforces the rules. The rules are understandable. All that might be impacted by diversity would be an active method of suppressing posters acting within the rules but opposed to the bias and/or encouraging those who don't act within the rules but share the root of the bias.What? :AMR:
Seriously, nearly fifty posts a day and each of this same remarkable quality...it's like a modern miracle. lain:I don't think they let :flamer:s be mods
I know!Seriously, nearly fifty posts a day and each of this same remarkable quality...it's like a modern miracle. lain:
Well, you're out of the running, then.I don't think they let :flamer:s be mods
To raid?
Sweet I'm in, are there plenty of pro-abort liberals to bash?
Is it full of Commies?
Is it someplace warm? I hope it's someplace warm.
We should tell CabinetMaker, he likes to go raiding.
Anyone else?
I think Bybees' in.
Nobody tell Knight, he doesn't like that sort of thing.
aCultureWarrior!
Reminds me of a certain fellow that posted all over the forum promoting himself for the position.Whoever gets the mod job should not be someone who campaigns for it. It has been my experience that those who actively seek power are the least well equipped to handle it. True in life, and true on the internet.
You read my mind!Reminds me of a certain fellow that posted all over the forum promoting himself for the position.