toldailytopic: Tiger Woods. Do you think he is truly repentant?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Apparently, you do not have any children.

Four

What does that have to do with doing good things?

Unbelievers can only do good works. Good works mean nothing to God, since all good works stem from human nature. Only fruit that comes from the Spirit means something to God

God wants us to love without hypocrisy.

If the "us" refers to believers, then yes that is true. However, we are talking about unbelievers. God wants unbelievers to become believers not to love without hypocrisy.

If you do not hold people accountable for evil behavior, you take away the opportunity to show them their need for God.

That is correct, and a good point. Evil does give us the opportunity to show unbelievers that they need a Savior.

We have laws as a society that hold people accountable for evil. However not all evil is illegal in the secular world. Abortion, homosexuality, prostitution, porn, etc are legal in many countries including right here in the USA.

So, we don't always have the means to hold people accountable.

Sadly, you have a skewed view of the importance of speaking against evil behavior.

You are entitled to think that, but in my opinion no one has ever become saved and guaranteed eternal life by being convinced to stop sinning or not doing anything evil any longer.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
It would also make a difference to all the folks that looked up to Tiger as a role model.

How?

So if a child grows up in a household with a monogamous marriage that child somehow has a better chance at becoming a believer?

If I’m a child, I would rather have an adulterous dad that was a believer who taught me about Jesus then a dad who was faithful to my mom, an unbeliever, and never even mentioned Jesus to me.

Sure I would be disappointed with my adulterous believer dad, but spending eternity in Heaven is much better then spending eternity in hell.
 
And you don't stress that they should do good?

Unbelievers can only do good works. Good works mean nothing to God, since all good works stem from human nature. Only fruit that comes from the Spirit means something to God
This has nothing to do with the discussion. Apparently, you don't understand the difference between morality and righteousness. That explains your confusion regarding everything else you say.
 

Quincy

New member
No, I meant do you consider yourself as most people in terms of "I've never met a person I'd believe a word from on the repentance deal. People are just sorry they got caught and beg for forgiveness so they don't get in trouble"

I don't share the same sentiment.

Your post above to Mary makes sense. And I suppose your reply here also answers the question to an extent. You don't consider yourself as other people in this regard. I was just curious.

It strikes me that folks very often don't seem to consider themselves included when they make statements about "people" or "most people ____." (I know I can fall into that hole). We tend to separate ourselves from what "other" people do. Especially if we think it's wrong
.

I agree, we do often single ourselves out. I can totally see how my statement implied that. The thing is I try my best not to do anything I wouldn't be proud of, or that I wouldn't stand by. Things I have done that I came to realize is wrong through guilt or law or w/e, honestly, I'd have to be saving an orphanage to do it again. As far as Tiger goes, his statement really only served to somewhat prove my point.

A lot of people do what they know is wrong and lie to themselves. I really believe he would still be doing it, and I would be shocked to learn he hasn't even once picked up his phone and wanted to call one of those women since this scandal broke. If he had just said I did what I did because I wanted to and didn't think anything bad of it at the time I'd be more likely to believe him. Now I don't believe anything he says, because if you can lie to yourself then you're really good at it, :chuckle: .

(But Mary I loved your "that's way too cynical" post. ... Don't mean to beat on you; just that original post'd really jumped out at me).

Eh, I can take it Zoo. Trust me, I've faced much harsher criticism with a calmly manner. I probably am overly cynical, but I don't get upset very easy. I'd believe someone was genuine in their regret once their actions prove it, but I can't before then. I'd really like to believe them just on the merit of their words, but that's not something that's proved to work out in my experience.

Quincy, regarding your comment that you don't apologize because you think it's meaningless, and that you need to actually "fix" things to make a wrong right... I agree that actually showing someone your apology, and rectifying a wrong is important. But have you considered that an apology might not be meaningless to the person on the other end? In fact, it might mean quite a lot. (As might not getting an apology). I understand completely what you're saying... But I don't agree at all that an apology is meaningless (unless of course, it's meaningless). And in fact, I think the sentiment "I can understand sometimes people just want to hear an 'I'm sorry' but it just don't feel right to me" is pretty selfish. Apologizing doesn't replace rectifying a wrong, but an apology can be a part of rectifying a wrong. Acknowledging it. Maybe you'll reconsider. :)

It's not that I think an apology is meaningless, it just feels weird to me. Let's say I did what Tiger did. Me apologizing for multiple long term affairs is just ridiculous, especially after admitting I knew it was wrong. Is he truely sorry about the actions? I doubt it. Now I would say, I did what I did, I was I wrong, and I truely regret causing the ones I love pain. Now I will make amends if given the chance. Then I wouldn't have said anything else about it. I would get busy making things up to whoever I hurt. I just don't see a need for all the talk.

I realize that an apology is meaningful to people, I just don't think people should beat it into the ground. Address the situation and move on and fix it, that's my motto.

That is probably my biggest beef with american society. When I grew up, I was lucky enough to have a mamaw that taught to be honorable and to be proud. In this country some people do things they know is wrong because they lie to themselves. A lot of people just don't seem to have any honor and expect they will get a second chance by law or something. I'll reconsider and take a look at the whole be more apologetic thing, but I'd rather earn forgiveness and I never expect it as some right which I think a lot of people do.
 

Nathon Detroit

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
How?

So if a child grows up in a household with a monogamous marriage that child somehow has a better chance at becoming a believer?

If I’m a child, I would rather have an adulterous dad that was a believer who taught me about Jesus then a dad who was faithful to my mom, an unbeliever, and never even mentioned Jesus to me.

Sure I would be disappointed with my adulterous believer dad, but spending eternity in Heaven is much better then spending eternity in hell.
When you observe unbelievers (who are friends of yours) doing immoral things do you....

1. Rebuke them.
2. Praise them.
3. Ignore their actions entirely.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
And you don't stress that they should do good?

A parent/child relationship is different than relationships we have with the general public.

Apparently, you don't understand the difference between morality and righteousness. .

There are many unbelievers who are the most moral people you would ever meet. Some of these really moral unbelievers make certain Christians look like drunken sailors.

Tell me how teaching an unbeliever to be moral gets that person eternal life?

Please don’t tell me that you think if you can teach a person to be a really nice moral person then eventually that person will become saved?

Again, if Tiger stops cheating on his wife, Tiger still goes to hell when he dies because Tiger is an unbeliever.

If you were given 5 minutes alone with Tiger would you spend it on his adultery or spend it talking about Jesus?
 
A parent/child relationship is different than relationships we have with the general public.
So, the ONLY way that you love your neighbor is telling them about Jesus. If your neighbor was beating his wife and children, you'd tell him the Gospel, and if he didn't listen, you'd ignore him while he keeps up the beatings, is that right?


There are many unbelievers who are the most moral people you would ever meet. Some of these really moral unbelievers make certain Christians look like drunken sailors.
Agreed. So if a believer beats his wife, you'd ignore it because he is already going to heaven.

Tell me how teaching an unbeliever to be moral gets that person eternal life?
It doesn't, nor has anyone suggested such a thing.

Please don’t tell me that you think if you can teach a person to be a really nice moral person then eventually that person will become saved?
You know, tet, I think you are so angry that your bankrupt theology has been exposed, that you just say stupid things like this to try and discredit others any way you can. You reek of self-righteousness, and it's making you look quite pathetic.

Again, if Tiger stops cheating on his wife, Tiger still goes to hell when he dies because Tiger is an unbeliever.
It's not all about Tiger. However, for Tiger's benefit, to rebuke him let's him know that he is depraved, and it opens the door to show him God's grace. Those who tolerate evil behavior see no need for the grace of God.

If you were given 5 minutes alone with Tiger would you spend it on his adultery or spend it talking about Jesus?
Both.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
When you observe unbelievers (who are friends of yours) doing immoral things do you....

1. Rebuke them.
2. Praise them.
3. Ignore their actions entirely.

On Easter Sunday I was able to get an unbeliever homosexual neighbor to go to church.

He went to church with our family, sat with us, and we even took him out for bagels after church.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
So, the ONLY way that you love your neighbor is telling them about Jesus. If your neighbor was beating his wife and children, you'd tell him the Gospel, and if he didn't listen, you'd ignore him while he keeps up the beatings, is that right?

Now you are conflating secular law with Evangelism.

As a citizen I have the responsibility to call the authorities if I see anyone hurting another citizen or breaking a law.
 

zoo22

Well-known member
.

I agree, we do often single ourselves out. I can totally see how my statement implied that. The thing is I try my best not to do anything I wouldn't be proud of, or that I wouldn't stand by. Things I have done that I came to realize is wrong through guilt or law or w/e, honestly, I'd have to be saving an orphanage to do it again. As far as Tiger goes, his statement really only served to somewhat prove my point.

A lot of people do what they know is wrong and lie to themselves. I really believe he would still be doing it, and I would be shocked to learn he hasn't even once picked up his phone and wanted to call one of those women since this scandal broke. If he had just said I did what I did because I wanted to and didn't think anything bad of it at the time I'd be more likely to believe him. Now I don't believe anything he says, because if you can lie to yourself then you're really good at it, :chuckle: .

That all makes sense to me. I wasn't necessarily pointing fingers at you (or Mary) as much as I was pointing fingers at us all. It's just interesting to me that we do that (separate ourselves from "others" so easily) and it seems to rear it's head in these types of threads, where folks have strong opinions regarding judging someone else.

I haven't been paying attention to what Tiger Woods has said through it all... I haven't followed it. So there's likely a lot I just don't know (well, I'm sure there is for us all).

Eh, I can take it Zoo. Trust me, I've faced much harsher criticism with a calmly manner.

I actually just meant that comment directed at Mary to let her know I wasn't jumping on her as much as I was on that particular first post she'd made... :)

I probably am overly cynical, but I don't get upset very easy. I'd believe someone was genuine in their regret once their actions prove it, but I can't before then. I'd really like to believe them just on the merit of their words, but that's not something that's proved to work out in my experience.

That makes sense to me.

It's not that I think an apology is meaningless, it just feels weird to me. Let's say I did what Tiger did. Me apologizing for multiple long term affairs is just ridiculous, especially after admitting I knew it was wrong. Is he truely sorry about the actions? I doubt it. Now I would say, I did what I did, I was I wrong, and I truely regret causing the ones I love pain. Now I will make amends if given the chance. Then I wouldn't have said anything else about it. I would get busy making things up to whoever I hurt. I just don't see a need for all the talk.

I realize that an apology is meaningful to people, I just don't think people should beat it into the ground. Address the situation and move on and fix it, that's my motto.

Good motto. I think moving on's the most important thing. Just different ways that happens. And I know some people often don't want an apology. Sometimes you have to show them. Some people need an apology and are willing to move on from there.

That is probably my biggest beef with american society. When I grew up, I was lucky enough to have a mamaw that taught to be honorable and to be proud. In this country some people do things they know is wrong because they lie to themselves. A lot of people just don't seem to have any honor and expect they will get a second chance by law or something. I'll reconsider and take a look at the whole be more apologetic thing, but I'd rather earn forgiveness and I never expect it as some right which I think a lot of people do.

I don't agree with it all, but nice post.

PS: I apologize for running off at the mouth... :plain:
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
It's not all about Tiger.

Have you read the thread topic?

However, for Tiger's benefit, to rebuke him let's him know that he is depraved, and it opens the door to show him God's grace. Those who tolerate evil behavior see no need for the grace of God.

Tiger was rebuked by many including the president of Augusta. Tiger’s response was that he needs to get back to his Buddhist beliefs. So much for rebuking an unbeliever.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Then in your world, the only things that are wrong is whatever the government deems is wrong, and not God.

Of course not.

Did you see this?

Fighting abortion has nothing to do with being a good soldier for Christ.

Her post is very long, and very good. I agree with what she says. It is not our duty to get unbelievers to stop sinning. We do as believers have the responsibility to say something to believers that continue in a sin, or advocate a certain sin. Our duty is to help unbelievers become believers
 
We're all well aware that you could care less about aborted babies tet, no need for you to keep repeating it.

It is possible to both share the Gospel, and save someone from destroying the lives of others or themselves. Not everyone has to be as apathetic as you.
 

kmoney

New member
Hall of Fame
What does Tiger being monogamous to his wife have to do with his kids?

If Tiger the Buddhist is monogamous does this somehow get his kids eternal life?

Being concerned about eternal life is fine, but it's not all there is. There is also THIS life and I, call me crazy, care about what his kids go through in THIS life. And his wife. Being a faithful husband and father is good for his wife and kids in THIS life, and that is reason enough to do it.


:plain:
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
It is possible to both share the Gospel, and save someone from destroying the lives of others or themselves. Not everyone has to be as apathetic as you.

Well, good luck stopping abortions and convincing Buddhists to be monogamous.

While you're at it, and if you have some spare time, maybe you could stop global warming, wipe out hunger, save whales, end wars, and make mother earth pristine again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top