I said praying for them doesn't show they care.
that is nonsense
I said praying for them doesn't show they care.
Because you keep ignoring the "if praying for them accomplishes nothing" part of that. Are you doing that on purpose? :think:that is nonsense
Where's that in the Bible?
Purgatory? It's a pretty good ski area just outside Durango, Colorado but it is not a holding tank for those who are saved but not quite saved enough to make it all the way to heaven. Why don't you think Jesus did enough for you?You seem to be failing to understand an opposing viewpoint.
Nozippy2006 said:Do Catholics accept all of the presuppositions you make here?
The notion that any and all traditions should be vetted solely against scripture and discarded if scripture does not support them.zippy2006 said:If not, which do they not accept?
Keeps it lively!zippy2006 said:How does that thing they do not accept impact the conversation? :idea:
CC #688 commences by claiming Rome
"transmits... the faith of the apostles",
but then proceeds to say it acts under
the authority of "Tradition" and Church
"Magisterium".
Typical of the self-contradictory statements found throughout the Catholic Catechism !
In this single section of the CC, Rome clearly indicates that it does not transmit the faith of the Apostles, instead utilizing several other and different authorities.
In their list here of eight sources, just ONE ("the Scriptures") is Apostolic !
Scripture alone being the only and sole record of Apostolic faith. Plenary inspired and inerrant. All the others merely traditions of men.
"Neglecting the commandment
of God, you hold to the tradition
of men"
(Mark 7:8 NASB)
"In vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines
the commandments of men" (Matthew 15:9 NKJ).
Thanks, AMR, it's appreciated.Why not just hyperlink the post so folks don't have to go scrolling about to find it? You can right click the post number and copy then post the link. Just a suggestion.
Except that serpent deliberately lied in failing to fully quote what I actually said. Looks like you've simply bought into his lie.In this thread, when another person stated that Catholics place the pope before Christ, you disagreed. However, the above quote would certainly seem to indicate that, at the least, a Catholic would place the pope as equal, another "head of" the Church. A slight difference between what was stated here and your quote, but close enough that the point made here seems valid.
Already answered here.If that isn't what is meant, then please explain, in your own words, what you mean when you state what you did in the above quote.
I'll be happy to answer, just as soon as you provide your answer.One could ask the same question regarding those the RCC claims interpret as well. Why should their interpretation be the only one accepted?
How in the world do you draw this conclusion from the biblical warning against adding to the book of Revelation?Revelation 22:18-19 - "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
Seems that the Word of God tells us just that, that it should be the source, and the ONLY source for spiritual matters.
Of course, your comment merely assumes that apostolic teaching is to be found in scripture alone (sola scriptura), and in no other sources. But this simply begs the question (petitio principii) in favor of the Protestant position. However, neither scripture itself, nor the beliefs and teachings of the early Christian Church, make any such assumption.In this single section of the CC, Rome clearly indicates that it does not transmit the faith of the Apostles, instead utilizing several other and different authorities.
Petitio principii.In their list here of eight sources, just ONE ("the Scriptures") is Apostolic!
Now go ahead and demonstrate this claim---rather than merely asserting it---from "scripture alone."Scripture alone being the only and sole record of Apostolic faith.
Yes, traditions of men such as, e.g., sola scriptura and sola fide."Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men" (Mark 7:8 NASB)
Why do the dead pray for us? Jesus taught us that Dives asked for his brothers to be enlightened and forewarned. That is the crux of prayer of the dead for the living!
Why would Jesus teach us that?
Why can the dead presume to pray (petition) for the living? Especially through a mediator?
Luke 16:27 and 28
I say this not to wound anyone personally, but to lead them to the truth.
...
What happened to witches in the Old Testament and what did they practice?
Well, according to just 1 Samuel 28, we know the following.
#1. Witches were commanded to be killed in the Old Testament times.
#2. Witches practiced in communicating with the dead.
I say this not to wound anyone personally, but to lead them to the truth.
...
Therefore, if a Catholic was living in the Old Testament times, they would have been put to death for practicing divination. If they didn't get caught in being punished for that, then they would have been killed for creating idols (i.e. little statues) and pretending that they held some type of power of some kind (See The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20)).