toldailytopic: How should TheologyOnline celebrate its 15 year anniversary?

[SaulToPaul 2]

Rep rampage

 

[some other dude]

toldailytopic: How should TheologyOnline celebrate its 15 year anniversary?

Pull the plugs, smash all our computers and start an Amish community.


Who's up for a barn raising?

 

[Psalmist]

Grant some of those who have been an invitation to accept a TOL amnesty, maybe with behavioral conditions.​

 

[Stripe]

Grant some of those who have been an invitation to accept a TOL amnesty, maybe with behavioral conditions.​

Looking for a second chance are you, Psalmist?

Come on! We know you!

 

[Sherman]

I like the idea of a costume party! Maybe I could come as my favorite composer or my favorite character from films. Or I could do something funny and dress up my default tree fort as something.

 

[Sherman]

Rep rampage

Like this idea--make them positive only. Classless members on site could rep people they don't like into the basement.

 

[Rusha]

Rep rampage

Like this idea--make them positive only. Classless members on site could rep people they don't like into the basement.

:thumb:

 

[chickenman]

Have a series of MAD threads.

Oh, wait...

 

[Ask Mr. Religion]

I would like to see us spend some time on what we have in common
and
at the same time try to understand those who have different views

Which reminds me. Let's also ban the butchering of the English grammar. :AMR:

AMR

 

[some other dude]

English am are frend!

 

[Todah]

I suggest to celebrate its 15th anniversary changing the name to :drum: "Atheists Online." They are allowed to remain, even after multiple bans, for infantile and crude remarks, and dominate practically every thread.

Add up all the posts by non christians versus Christians, in the past year. If they win, change the name!

 

[some other dude]

I suggest to celebrate its 15th anniversary changing the name to :drum: "Atheists Online." They are allowed to remain, even after multiple bans, for infantile and crude remarks, and dominate practically every thread.

Add up all the posts by non christians versus Christians, in the past year. If they win, change the name!

We need some way to account for the leftist "Christians" who support them while mocking God and His Holy Word, the evolutionists, the homo-supporters, those who are fuzzy on abortion, the Bible-revisionists...

 

[Todah]

We need some way to account for the leftist "Christians" who support them while mocking God and His Holy Word, the evolutionists, the homo-supporters, those who are fuzzy on abortion, the Bible-revisionists...

I agree. The "best and the brightest" on this site, are the god-fearing, Biblical believers. However if we add all of the atheists and nonbelievers, to the group you just mentioned, they are the ones who run this site, by sheer volume, and intensity.

 

[some other dude]

And oh how they whine when confronted. :chuckle:

 

[Ted L Glines]

I suggest to celebrate its 15th anniversary changing the name to :drum: "Atheists Online." They are allowed to remain, even after multiple bans, for infantile and crude remarks, and dominate practically every thread.

Add up all the posts by non christians versus Christians, in the past year. If they win, change the name!

Thus far, I have not seen atheists dominating the Christian TOL threads. Are the "Politics" and "The Rest" threads of importance to Christian discussions? In spite of our annoying arrogance, we Christians are not the end-all be-all of world opinion. Have you hugged your atheist today LOL

 

[Nick M]

If we had a TOL "get together" in Las Vegas who would attend? :think:

I would. However, I can't. If you do, be sure VC gets notice beforehand. You could have a smokers only party someplace. Casino's typically work.

 

[Nick M]

Rep rampage

Only if we can put G&P in the red like thelaqachisnext.

"A Paulinist group is one who subtily places Paul above Christ in authority." -

All of you know my presuppositions and I will not apologize for them. I am a Paulinist, an absoluter, and believe that God has given his final word on the gospel in the revelation of Jesus Christ to Paul. ...These exceptions have to be interpreted in light of the absolutely clear kerygma of the Pauline gospel....
I am convinced that the apostle John became a dedicated and passionate defender of Paul's gospel after Paul was martyred. He might have had suspicions of Paul early-on. But later in life, after witnessing the stamp of the Holy Spirit on Paul's ministry and the truth of his claims to the ultimate revelation, he became the most passionate Paulinist in history! Not that he followed Paul; he defended Paul's full-corn gospel only because Paul followed Christ.
So you do not believe he is a "MAD Paulinist?' -Just that he believes that "God has given his final word on the gospel in the revelation of Jesus Christ to Paul."

If one says "I follow Paul", they are "of Paul" -a "Paulinist".
If one says "I follow Christ", they are a Christian, or "of Christ" [or claiming to be]. If one says I follow Peter", they are "of Peter" -"Petrinite"? if one says "I follow Marcion" they are marcionites -or "Paulinists".

"Pauline" is the preference you would want, then, not "Paulinists"

STATEMENT OF FAITH:
http://www.discerningthetimespublishing.com/what_we_believe.htm
We are therefore Pauline in doctrine and practice and consider such understanding to constitute that which is like-minded.


A Pauline Dispensationalist is one who is defined as "Paulinist";
**link edited out because it was too long and messing up the formatting**
And BTYW Knight:
I will never "run out of time, as TOL will, when your cup of iniquity gets full and God pours it back out on you, for I have been born again into the Living Spirit of Christ, and therefore have eternal Life in me by His Spirit.

Fear God and live. Obey the One Gospel and be born of His Spirit or remain a worm forever in the lake of fire.
He has said what He meant, and you are in delusion of spirit by the willfull blindness of your own choosing.
I am sorry for you all who have followed a doctrine which is damnable as to the Person and finished work of the LORD Jesus Christ.

I'll be out there, somewhere, giving Scriptural rebuttals to you MAD Paulinists, who are not born again in the One Living Spirit of Christ, and who deny the One Gospel of Christ.

They are probably sisters. Or one in the same. I wouldn't be suprised either way.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Only if we can put G&P in the red like thelaqachisnext.



They are probably sisters. Or one in the same. I wouldn't be suprised either way.

In the red/in the black:


GP : "It's all the same. Red is the shadow of the reality of black."

 

[Sherman]

There are a few annoying members I wish were in the red, but we can't ban people because they annoy us or seem trollish. There always going to be members that grate on each other because their world views are dead opposite--One is right and the other is dead wrong. The wrong one needs the chance to see the Light.

 

[Nick M]

There are a few annoying members I wish were in the red, but we can't ban people because they annoy us or seem trollish.

I have thought at times I wish godrulz was banned. But that isn't the case. He should stay so his perversion is exposed and people know what to say to somebody like him. I don't ding him as much as I used to do it.

What is funny is when the heathen do it back and start dropping 4 letter f-bombs at you in the rep comments. And then joke and laugh with high fiving each other saying how rude I am to them.