:doh:Can you explain?
I know its been a while, but I have way in on this one. And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. Gen7:20" The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered. 21 And all flesh died that moved on the earth: birds and cattle and beasts and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, and every man. 22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life, all that was on the dry land, died."
Lest say that the whole earth was covered in the flood and God wanted to tells us that, how much clearer could He say it than this? In other words, what would a verse have to look like in order for us to believe that the whole earth was covered?
:doh:
What is the remains of a large wooden rectangular structure doing up high on the Northeast side of Masis, (called Mt Ararat today because of the assumption on what it is)?
What is it? Did somebody take the wood up there and build it on the spot? CIA outpost spying on Iran and the former Soviet Union?
Pssssst, c'mere, I have this bridge I can sell you, cheap.
That is your answer? Does that mean you don't know, or don't want to answer? Keep in mind, I don't know either, but you have to admit it is rather intriguing. Especially given the eyewitness testimony going back as far as Josephus. Back when the earth was warming, and it wasn't covered in snow. Whatever it is.
No, it is not an answer, just a comment. If you are gullible enough to believe that the remains of Noah's Ark are extant on Mt. Ararat, then you ought to be gullible enough to buy the Brooklyn Bridge..(See P.T. Barnum)
So back to the question. What is it? Do you think the people that claim it is there, are lying about what they saw, or that they saw nothing, and just made it up?
I have no difficulty accepting the fact that some Christians (or non-Christians) are willing to make things up, or to make assumptions about what they see, to satisfy their faith, impress others or make a buck, take your pick (See the Paluxy dino/human foot prints, see Kent Hovind in general, see Walt Brown's Hydroplate "Theory").
In case you forgot, this is a drawing of what people say they have seen.
What is it? Or did they lie, and they saw nothing? If you think they lied, that is fine. I just want to know what you think of their testimony.
View attachment 15217
Ok. So they made it up. Nobody saw that thing in the attachment I put on. Just making sure.
Pssssst, c'mere, I have this bridge I can sell you, cheap.
"They" saw something. Probably a shadow.
Firstly, Josephus was giving reports from other people he himself was not an eyewitness AND the mountain he referred to is not the Mount Ararat of modern times. That particular identification didn't become fashionable until the 12th century.That is your answer? Does that mean you don't know, or don't want to answer? Keep in mind, I don't know either, but you have to admit it is rather intriguing. Especially given the eyewitness testimony going back as far as Josephus.