lucy
New member
How would that same argument not apply to heterosexuals? IF this is about people answering questions or speaking about their sexuality, then obviously the rule should be applied to all.
IF a gay man is not permitted to speak about his husband/SO and family, why should a heterosexual man be able to mention his wife and family?
I have no problem with rules against sexual harassment that are applied across the board. However, why is it that some people just naturally assume that gay men are going to be the one's doing the harassing?
Heterosexual men are known to harass women and yet when THAT issue comes up it is normally met with the attitude of "Oh boys will be boys. That's why women shouldn't be allowed in the military."
Rather than anticipating problems based on nothing other than personal or religious bias, it would make more sense to deal with people on an individual basis.
I have not assumed that gay men or women are going to be the one's doing the harassing. Quite the opposite. I am of the opinion that the "boys will be boys attitude" will be applied to gay men, that is, that it is the gay men who will be at greater risk and will be targeted by non-gay men who feel threatened or phobic towards gay men.
The military MUST anticipate problems based on what is known of the personal and religious biases of those that serve in the military. They do not have the luxury to allow experimental studies in human sociology in combat zones...