I agree with you. My husband passed away at home last December. He had metastatic adenocarcinoma and died within six months of being diagnosed. We had discussed choices and he said he wished to live but be kept pain free. His wishes were honored.
I'm sorry if I sounded testy. You are one of my favorite people on here and I do not wish to offend you.
So. Are all those that condemn assisted suicide sadists then? Taking pleasure in other people's pain? I mean, neither of you specified so it seems you're speaking generally about all.
:mmph:
I am opposed to assisted suicide.
Wow this is a difficult topic, and I for one am a advocate for assisted suicide.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/feb/02/terry-pratchett-assisted-suicide-tribunal
This is an amazing article by a fantastic writer who was diagnosed with a rare form of Alzheimer's, I urge you all to read it.
Prolonging someone's agony to satisfy your own desires has to be one of the most twisted misapplications of mercy and morality I can imagine...
GodI agree. Who would desire agony for a loved one?
Which makes the reluctance of some to allow their loved ones to chose when to die completely misguided and ultimately selfish.
If you would forcefully prolong a person's agony by forbidding anyone to take a mercy kill, you ARE indeed promoting the suffering of others for the sake of your own twisted sense of moral purity. There is no way around that, no matter how you try to spin it.
Wow this is a difficult topic, and I for one am a advocate for assisted suicide, however . . . .
What concerns me is such a laws potential for abuse, abuse that will result in murder. Until a proper system can be worked out and it is watched over thoroughly I do not think it should be made legal or what have you.
I think in many cases it is the humane thing to do, regardless of what it may do to our souls (for lack of a better word)!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/feb/02/terry-pratchett-assisted-suicide-tribunal
This is an amazing article by a fantastic writer who was diagnosed with a rare form of Alzheimer's, I urge you all to read it.
Someone might want to remind MC that it's silly for her to ask me questions after she whined about my posts and I humored her by putting her on the ignore list. Just a thought.
Dessert and suicide are equally moral?
The new guy's an idiot.
Disagree. There's more to life than that. Funny thing about blind people is that blind people may not know their blind.
I don't think you're following my point at all. If a family member's suffering is prolonged by their family desiring "not to kill grampa," or so and so, whose wishes are really being honored?
I already know that.
If grandpa wants to die then let him die.
If he is suffering then you can put him out of his misery.
But I wasn't talking about that.
You are only talking about just that.
And I was trying to say "Wake up."
What you are saying is fine from a human's perspective.
1. Kill suffering grandpa? Sure.
2. Can suffering grandpa ask for death? Yes.
3. Can we put grandpa out of his misery? Yes.
4. But are those the real questions? No.
I already know that.
If grandpa wants to die then let him die.
If he is suffering then you can put him out of his misery.
But I wasn't talking about that.
You are only talking about just that.
And I was trying to say "Wake up."
What you are saying is fine from a human's perspective.
1. Kill suffering grandpa? Sure.
2. Can suffering grandpa ask for death? Yes.
3. Can we put grandpa out of his misery? Yes.
4. But are those the real questions? No.
1. Should Assistant Suicide be legal? Yes.
2. Can Assistant Suicide be moral? Depends.
3. Can we educate, too, to better help people make their decisions? Yes.
Troll.:down: