I learned a few things about tides I hadn't known before. That is kind of cool.I really cannot believe this thread actually exists.
We are all dumber for participating in it.
I learned a few things about tides I hadn't known before. That is kind of cool.I really cannot believe this thread actually exists.
We are all dumber for participating in it.
I mooned over a girl once, but I don't think she found it attractive. lain:When I was a kid I mooned a crowd of people....The gravitational pull attracted a Cop. lain:
What you mean?I really cannot believe this thread actually exists.
We are all dumber for participating in it.
Tides exist, sure. I've seen the ocean. But I've never seen tides in a pond. You say we can't see it measure them, but they're there. You have faith that they're there. I'm saying they aren't there. I'm basing my opinion on what I observe. You're basing your opinion on what you believe in.
Daniel if the tidal movement in the Atlantic ocean is a couple of meters in depth when its 310,410,900,000,000,000 cubic meters, what level of shift would you expect of see in a pond which is about 1 cubic meter of water?
And do you think that level of tidal shift would be observable?
So, you believe their is a tidal effect on ponds even though you can't measure it. You believe in it. You attribute it to the moon's gravity based on the ocean tides. Rather than considering an explanation that may explain why there is a tide in the ocean and not ponds, you just assume that it is the moon because you believe in something you can't test. That was my point. People keep saying that we can't measure it because it is just that small...so they're basically saying believe in it with no evidence.
What is the explanation you think is superior for why there are tides in the ocean?
Pretty much any natural explanation is better than the mystical magical gravity. The land and whatever is below it probably sits on top of the oceans, and gently rocks on it. Could be that. Could be some kind of pressure under the ocean floor. I'm not positive but it isn't magic, or "gravity" as it's know.
What is the natural explanation you think is superior that the one we have? The theory of gravity does not use "magic" as the explanation or even part of the explanation. You are lying about that, again. And then you wonder why you have no credibility.
Gravity is the cure all for heliocentrism. Sometimes it pulls everything to the earth, except when it makes things orbit the earth. It is strong enough to hold the oceans on the globe but weak enough to be easily escaped or over powered by the weaker gravity of the moon. You name it, gravity does it.
Why don't we feel the spin? Gravity.
Why do we fall back to earth? Gravity.
Why does the moon orbit us? Gravity
The tides? Gravity.
It's magic. It can make things stick to the earth or orbit it depending on what heliocentrists need it to do. If they don't have an answer for it, it's gravity.
So, you believe their is a tidal effect on ponds even though you can't measure it. You believe in it. You attribute it to the moon's gravity based on the ocean tides. Rather than considering an explanation that may explain why there is a tide in the ocean and not ponds, you just assume that it is the moon because you believe in something you can't test. That was my point. People keep saying that we can't measure it because it is just that small...so they're basically saying believe in it with no evidence.
Gravity is the cure all for heliocentrism. Sometimes it pulls everything to the earth, except when it makes things orbit the earth. It is strong enough to hold the oceans on the globe but weak enough to be easily escaped or over powered by the weaker gravity of the moon. You name it, gravity does it.
Why don't we feel the spin? Gravity.
Why do we fall back to earth? Gravity.
Why does the moon orbit us? Gravity
The tides? Gravity.
It's magic. It can make things stick to the earth or orbit it depending on what heliocentrists need it to do. If they don't have an answer for it, it's gravity.
Pretty much any natural explanation is better than the mystical magical gravity. The land and whatever is below it probably sits on top of the oceans, and gently rocks on it. Could be that. Could be some kind of pressure under the ocean floor. I'm not positive but it isn't magic, or "gravity" as it's know.
Pretty much any natural explanation is better than the mystical magical gravity. The land and whatever is below it probably sits on top of the oceans, and gently rocks on it. Could be that. Could be some kind of pressure under the ocean floor. I'm not positive but it isn't magic, or "gravity" as it's know.
In your world, what keeps the water on the land? Since land is composed largely of rocks and rocks are denser than water, what keeps your flat disk floating on the ocean?
Just buoyancy itself. I'm denser than water but I can lay in my back and float. It's just buoyancy. The land probably sits on top of the oceans and rocks gently causing tides.
Here's where I might blow your mind. I don't know what is under the earth more than 8 miles down because that is as far as anyone has dug. When the text book shows you the gobstopper earth with the layers and the spinning candy center, it is all speculation. No one knows what is way down there so water is just as plausible as the crunchy candy center you see in textbooks. If everyone were honest and only made statements based on what we know, no one would claim to know what us under the earth more than 8 miles down. Because no one knows.
One can only hope that you are ineligible to vote.
Way to ignore the point.
Way to ignore the point.
The point is obvious. Your lack of understanding and lack of desire to understand is frightening in an adult.
The human body is actually slightly less dense than water which is why you float. Rocks are far more dense than you are so why would they float?Just buoyancy itself. I'm denser than water but I can lay in my back and float. It's just buoyancy. The land probably sits on top of the oceans and rocks gently causing tides.
There is a huge difference between not having seen and not knowing. While we don't know with 100% certainty, we have very good ideas because we have done the science. We have observed and studied and found that the layer model most accurately matches what we observe.Here's where I might blow your mind. I don't know what is under the earth more than 8 miles down because that is as far as anyone has dug. When the text book shows you the gobstopper earth with the layers and the spinning candy center, it is all speculation. No one knows what is way down there so water is just as plausible as the crunchy candy center you see in textbooks. If everyone were honest and only made statements based on what we know, no one would claim to know what us under the earth more than 8 miles down. Because no one knows.