Nang has conniption fits
The only person who has conniption fits is heir.
heir cannot handle when someone disagrees with her Acts 9/Bullingerism.
Nang has conniption fits
The only person who has conniption fits is heir.
heir cannot handle when someone disagrees with her Acts 9/Bullingerism.
COVENANT!
The Greek word "diatheke" means "covenant" in Heb 8:6.
No matter how hard you Darby Followers try, you can't make Heb 8:6 fit into Darby's false teachings.
Dispensationalism is a mess.
Aarghh . . . no sinners can believe, until they are first forgiven and regenerated to new spiritual life...
No, Heir, like many of us, would like to have a conversation without having to put up with your crap.
COVENANT!
SHUT UP :troll:
Not at all.Nang has conniption fits whenever people talk about the Gospel being the Power of God unto Salvation. :sigh:
TESTAMENT!
Anderson was a Darby Follower.
Therefore, anything you quote from him, is meaningless.
Why do you continue to run and hide from the truth concerning the New Covenant revealed at Jeremiah 31:31-34?
Jeremiah 31:31-34 was fulfilled by Christ Jesus. That's why the writer of Hebrews quoted it.
Look here Pat Benatar, I'm not running, or hiding.
The Father calls and His beloved hear.
So? When are you ever going to address Jeremiah 31:31-34?
Darby Followers hate the book of Hebrews.
The book of Hebrews singlehandedly refutes Dispensationalism in one fell swoop.
That's all the little arms Josephus/Russell/Hannegraaf has. Poor little unemployed weasel, with his Catholic "Hail Mary"-Darby spam.
I feel sorry for wife, and kids, you pathetic, obsessed little weasel/unemployed leach.
And that's rich, seeing that Craigie just quotes Christ rejector, Josephus, and water baptismal regenerationists, Max King, J. Stuart Russell(church of Christ members-a cult, like Preterism), and the Catholic church teaching on prophetic events, as he has admitted.
45 out of Craigies last 56 "posts" have a "Darby" spam.
Darby Followers hate the book of Hebrews.
The book of Hebrews singlehandedly refutes Dispensationalism in one fell swoop.
Er,no.
(Exodus 24:8) Moses then took the blood, sprinkled it on the people and said, "This is the blood of the covenant that the LORD has made with you in accordance with all these words."
As we see above "has made" was not an event that would happen in the future.
Now, lets jump to the first century:
(Hebrews 8:13) By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.
Once again, we find "has made". Not a future event.
No matter how hard you Darby Followers try, your Dispensationalism cannot stand the test of scripture.
Give it up Little Johnny W....Darby was wrong...quit being a follower of his false teachings.
Christ Jesus didn't shed His blood, and then say, "Oh Wait", the covenant that I just shed my blood for won't happen for at least 2,000 years
Christ Jesus didn't shed His blood, and then say, "Oh Wait", the covenant that I just shed my blood for won't happen for at least 2,000 years
What's there to address Jerry?
The New Covenant was made, exactly how it was prophesied in Jer 31.