Watching Darby Followers argue with each other is very amusing.
Ephesians and Romans both make any type of Dispensationalism non-defendable.
Darby Followers cannot defend Dispensationalism when asked to explain how the Romans were saved before Paul, and they cannot defend Dispensationalism when asked to explain Ephesians.
Ephesians and Romans both make any type of Dispensationalism non-defendable.
Darby Followers cannot defend Dispensationalism when asked to explain how the Romans were saved before Paul, and they cannot defend Dispensationalism when asked to explain Ephesians.
Last edited: