musterion
Well-known member
Could it be that you're frantically dissembling?
Don't project.
How was I inconsistent when I quoted Christ?
Could it be that you're frantically dissembling?
If I bring up the anecdote it's ....
AB says I am not a homosexual.
I was briefly tempted to allow a homosexual to perform an act he had offered.if a man can also be aroused by the thought of homosexual contact, rather than be viscerally repelled at the thought, he is a homosexual.
This isn't that complicated. You were a homosexual by the very definition or criteria you offered in this very thread.
It's laughable that 'ban hammer' Sherman is protect you from being trolled when others are simply pointing out your hypocrisy if you're not going to apply your own definition to yourself.
Were you a homosexual before you were saved? Use your own definition in this thread if you need help deciding.
:flamer: - by your definition no less. I supposed the argument is that you weren't aroused but just "tempted".
This isn't that complicated. You were a homosexual by the very definition or criteria you offered in this very thread.
It's laughable that 'ban hammer' Sherman is protect you from being trolled when others are simply pointing out your hypocrisy if you're not going to apply your own definition to yourself.
Were you a homosexual before you were saved? Use your own definition in this thread if you need help deciding.
:flamer: - by your definition no less. I supposed the argument is that you weren't aroused but just "tempted".
This isn't that complicated. You were a homosexual by the very definition or criteria you offered in this very thread.
It's laughable that 'ban hammer' Sherman is protect you from being trolled when others are simply pointing out your hypocrisy if you're not going to apply your own definition to yourself.
Were you a homosexual before you were saved? Use your own definition in this thread if you need help deciding.
:flamer: - by your definition no less. I supposed the argument is that you weren't aroused but just "tempted".
You did not tell me how my quoting Christ just then was inconsistent. Please do.
Thank you.
:doh: WoO
"briefly tempted to allow" =/= "aroused by the thought" :nono:
People in Christ are no longer who and what they were before.
You'd read that, but did you ever believe it?
back in the day, i was briefly tempted to allow a fraternity brother to share his cocaine/opiate pipe with me
but i certainly wasn't aroused by the thought
I already addressed this.
If briefly considering letting the homosexual do what he offered made me a homosexual, then I was a homosexual for all of about 2 minutes.
And THAT was BEFORE I died.
Happy?
Really? It doesn't sound gay at all to you that he was "tempted" to engage in homosexual activity?
You noticed their hypocrisy. It's the same type of selective definition often seen when a homosexual gets busted for child molestation, some insist that that person wasn't a "true" homosexual.
You noticed their hypocrisy.
You noticed their hypocrisy. It's the same type of selective definition often seen when a homosexual gets busted for child molestation, some insist that that person wasn't a "true" homosexual.
You mean when I called you a chav? Do forgive me.
yes, it does
but that's irrelevant if you're trying, as anna and artie are, to convict him with his own words
iow, if you're playing the "i caught a hypocrite" game