Do we have the pleasure of addressing Mr. Fuddy, or his partner Mr. Duddy?
Yeah, EE, the hipster textuals is a trifle annoying.
#And your British Police Hat is a trifle gaudy!
Do we have the pleasure of addressing Mr. Fuddy, or his partner Mr. Duddy?
Yeah, EE, the hipster textuals is a trifle annoying.
By the way. Are you one of these youthful Hashtags Can Save the World types?
False teaching that GOD saves unbelievers?What Calvinism comes down to is that their false teachings are all based on God saving unbelievers.
False teaching that GOD saves unbelievers?
Scripture might have something to say about it.
Romans 11:32 KJV
(32) For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
If unbelievers have no means to attain salvation, why even preach to them?
Now if you want to word it as "Unbelievers are not saved" (as in while they are in unbelief), that would be fine.
But to say GOD does not or cannot ever save unbelievers is not fine.
And there's that bit about branches being grafted BACK IN.
They are grafted in even though they once were unbelievers.
So, yeah, unbelievers can be saved, otherwise there is no need to even preach to them.
I mean, it's not like "once an unbeliever, always an unbeliever".
Unbelievers can become saved believers.
And let's not forget the tale of Jacob and Esau, one elected of GOD before he did anything at all.
[MENTION=14521]God's Truth[/MENTION]
Read this 5 times, then come back into the discussion.
You are behind. He is commenting on the information that I gave, and, I have already made the assertion that Calvinists do use scripture just as he claims he does.
I have not been proven wrong, because mere denial does not work that way.
Calvinists us scripture, just as you do, and you both misunderstand those scriptures that you use for your false beliefs.
I have also already explained how to stop misunderstanding, how to get knowledge, but you think it is a hashtag joke.
You left off most of it.Tambora,
I'm going to answer for @God's Truth.
"Obey First"
# Disclaimer: I in no way agree with the statement in quotations.
False teaching that GOD saves unbelievers?
Scripture might have something to say about it.
If unbelievers have no means to attain salvation, why even preach to them?
Now if you want to word it as "Unbelievers are not saved" (as in while they are in unbelief), that would be fine.
But to say GOD does not or cannot ever save unbelievers is not fine.
And there's that bit about branches being grafted BACK IN.
They are grafted in even though they once were unbelievers.
mere denialThat is not flattery.
You left off most of it.
GT - "We have to obey EVERYTHING Jesus says".
Matthew 16:20 KJV
(20) Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
opcorn:
Your Wrong Tambora!
I'm missing one eye, both feet and one hand.
# What Now?
# Smacking my forehead with my only hand.
# Mt. 5:30 abuse
mere denial
This is fun.
Of course, you think mocking others is fun. I knew that.
Believe what you want.You do know don't you that you are now going against Musterion?
That's what I said.All are bound to the same place...all are condemned, UNLESS...unless what? Unless they come to Christ in BELIEF
Quote any Calvinist here that has said that.Calvinists claim that God saves UNBELIEVERS in their state of unbelief.
That's what I said.That is right, BUT NOT while they are UNBELIVERS.
They have to believe BEFORE they can be grafted back in.
Of course, you think mocking others is fun. I knew that.
With your bull headed additions to the gospel, it's either have fun and laugh, or cry that you don't get the most important part of it.