8/11 posts have "Darby." You worthless mutt.
The Preterists and Matthew 24:34
- Thread starter Jerry Shugart
- Start date
8/11 posts have "Darby." You worthless mutt.
9/12 last posts have "Darby." What a loser you are, mutt-even your 3rd wife is laughing at you, Joseph Smith follower.
musterion
Well-known member
Funny you mention that. I just read yesterday how Mormons tend to have partial preterist leanings that are pretty much identical to those seen here.
Satanic-he made that up. He's been shown, for 3 years, but his father, the devil, keeps telling him to deny it.
It's English Grammar 101
Statement: This generation will not pass away
Condition: Until all these things be fulfilled.
Maybe you should consider a Remedial English 101 course.
Ask him about this:
"That's not my argument."I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."--habitual liar Wimpy Tet.
“I never said it was wrong for how old it is.”-Tet.
vs.
"My argument is that if there is not one single trace of something for 1,800+ years by anyone, then it was invented.”-Tet.
He's spamming "Darby," and his "No one ever taught the rapture before Fred Flintstone did" spam.
Joseph Smith was a contemporary of John Nelson Darby.
Both invented their belief systems in the mid 1800's.
Darby and Smith were not alone in the "age of the cults".
Charles Taze Russell, Ellen White, and Mary Baker Eddy were also contemporaries of John Nelson Darby and Joseph Smith during the "age of the cults".
You deceiving punk, actress:
"...spelling was never one of my strong points.."- stupid Tet. on TOL
"The rules of grammar have to be thrown out the window.."-].."- stupid Tet. on TOL in the past
vs.
"I rarely correct or point out someone's grammer and/or spelling"-stupid Tet. on TOL
vs.
"No matter what you say or do, whether it's spelling, grammer, punctuation, etc. Johnny will try so hard to make you look like you aren't smart."-].."- stupid Tet. on TOL
vs.
This post, and...
-stupid Tet. on TOL, to a poster:
"Do you even understand the simple basics of grammer?"-stupid Tet.
vs.
"will try so hard to make you look like you aren't smart."-stupid Tet.
"At least the TOL user who goes by the name "Colossians" understands grammer (he claims to be a grammarian). This is why when you, and him, and me were debating "This Generation" in Matt 24 he was smart enough to know that your "pronoun argument" falls apart grammatically. That is why he was forced to claim that "generation" meant something other than "generation", while you went on and on about how "this" really means "that"."-stupid Tet.
vs.
“I find it funny how you dispies obsess with the spelling and grammer errors of people who don't agree with your dispensationalism.Whether it's the improper use of "who vs. whom", or a misspelled word, you guys somehow think that if you obsess with the error it means your opponent isn't as smart as you, and therefore you win the debate……I rarely correct or point out someone's grammer and/or spelling.”-stupid Tet.
You sniveling, lying punk-and you can't even spell "grammar."
Habitual liar-hypocrite. Maybe you should consider a refresher course, from your father, the devil, the father of all lies, on how to lie better, sweetie.
Leave TOL, you demon.
whitestone
Well-known member
great!,,(lets stay on the same subject) ,,,on the same page book 5,ch. 5 he uses it 4 more times what do you think he means?
whitestone
Well-known member
lol,yep it's older than he thinks,,,
Spam, from the Preterist perverter, denying the resurrection, including the Lord Jesus Christ's resurrection, and denying that He is a mediator.
Well....as we see, not one Darby follower can explain Matt 24:34
The Darby followers can't even agree amongst themselves with their excuses. So far in this thread we have five excuses by Darby followers.
It's such a simple verse, that is so simple to understand.
However, because the verse is a death knell to Dispensationalism, the Darby followers have to twist it into a pretzel in an attempt to validate their excuses.
The fact that we have FIVE different excuses from Darby followers as to why the verse doesn't really mean what it says, is proof that Darby followers have no interest in truth.
The Darby followers can't even agree amongst themselves with their excuses. So far in this thread we have five excuses by Darby followers.
It's such a simple verse, that is so simple to understand.
However, because the verse is a death knell to Dispensationalism, the Darby followers have to twist it into a pretzel in an attempt to validate their excuses.
The fact that we have FIVE different excuses from Darby followers as to why the verse doesn't really mean what it says, is proof that Darby followers have no interest in truth.
Ask him about it. You won't get a peep out of him. His "ministry" is habitual lying, sophistry.
There's not a trace of a rapture or a secret parenthetical dispensation before Darby.
That's because Darby invented both.
But that won't stop you from being a Darby follower.
10/13 posts ="Darby."
"The Darby followers can't even agree amongst themselves....."=spam for the 666th time
He admits that Preterism is false, as "Preterist followers cannot even agree amongst themselves as to..............(fill in the blank), as there are "Full Preterists,"" Partial Preterists,"................
He can't be this stupid.
You cannot explain why you have 3 wives, and assert that everyone is saved, Joseph Smith follower.
Your Preterism, Mormonism, and Catholicism, is demonic.
whitestone
Well-known member
no,you read A.H. 5.5.1&.2 and saw what he explained and don't want to admit to what he said http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/irenaeus-book5.html
Although it's irrelevant, the demon been shown, for years, quotes from other Christians, including the "church fathers," by other TOL members, asserting the doctrine of the "catching away/seizure/plucking by force," i.e., the "rapture," but his father the devil tells him just to keep spamming his satanic assertion.