I think that's a really interesting thing to ponder. I have a fine art background. Degrees from top art schools. And even thought it's focussed on visual arts, I'm sure it colors my appreciation of music, greatly. One of the things I like about jazz is that it's 'smart'. But how am I perceiving that? Do others perceive it as I do? If we talked about it, I think they are, at least to some degree.
I've been dodging this for a while and maybe now is the time to brace it ... I think the creative impulse is expressed in many ways and they are all legitimate in their own way and draw from the same wellspring, as it were, be it music, art, sex or any other creative endeavor.
I could tell you why a painting or a sculpture is smart, honest, good, bad, or whatever. And I could make an effort at doing so with music, but I doubt I'd hear what a fine musician hears. And I know I couldn't articulate it the way they could.
I respectfully disagree for the reasons stated above ... except for the articulating part.
We do each experience art in our own way. No doubt. And yet I think we do also have a universal experience of it. Because we agree at least as much as we disagree about the experience, when we share it with others.
Depending on whether or not you like Madonna
And a good example, too. When I was young, I loved 'Aqualung', and 'Thick As A Brick'. But I haven't listened to them in many years, and have little desire to, now.
I saw them play "Thick as a Brick" when it came out. After they finished Anderson said immediately' "And now for our next song". :chuckle: funny stuff.
It's not the music that changed, of course, it's me.
Yeah, time does that to you.