Paul had MANY revelations from the Lord...including a trip to the third heaven (Paradise).
Turbo doesn't have "Spiritual Discernment", Glory.
Paul had MANY revelations from the Lord...including a trip to the third heaven (Paradise).
Giving God all the glory is holiness? Cool. :thumb:
I'm merely stating what Paul does.
I'm not surprised you would say that, however.
You have a worker bent in you.
Your "study" and your "methods" are evidence of that.
Giving God all the glory is holiness? Cool. :thumb:
I'm merely stating what Paul does.
I'm not surprised you would say that, however.
You have a worker bent in you.
Your "study" and your "methods" are evidence of that.
Are you saying those who have believed unto righteousness have any desire whatsoever to please themselves? That those who have believed unto righteousness have any desire to put themselves first?
You're wrong. That you still have such lusts and desires just shows you have not been created a new creature in Christ Jesus.
I didn't need to go back to chapter 18 so see that you were wrong about their baptism.
Paul had MANY revelations from the Lord...including a trip to the third heaven (Paradise).
You find it strange because you don't see that being baptized into one body BY THE SPIRIT, is the ONE BAPTISM that saves. And it is the effect of being begotten by the Gospel when we are given the earnest of the Spirit.
1 Corinthians 1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
For what? You were incorrect in your "I suggest that John did not baptize them". The bible says that he did.Then you have no argument.
For what? You were incorrect in your "I suggest that John did not baptize them". The bible says that he did.
And AGAIN, do you think that everyone that John baptized had to be re-baptized?
For what? You were incorrect in your "I suggest that John did not baptize them". The bible says that he did.
And AGAIN, do you think that everyone that John baptized had to be re-baptized?
So you're saying John the Baptist taught Jesus enough that they were believers to the point that Paul didn't need to teach them anything? You have verses to show John preached Jesus is the Christ?
John was in jail before or very soon after Jesus started his ministry.
I would suggest to you John did not baptize these men. If you read the end of Acts 18, you can see what they were taught.
You should just admit that you were wrong and move on.Acts 19:3 (AKJV/PCE)(19:3) And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.
This, o clueless one...
Is Holiness Movement nonsense.
Unfortunately, those of your pals on here who do not agree with you on that may follow their same old same old and not address your error.
You're left with those of your ignorant pals who not only agree with your error, but who only high-five those who have not offended the obvious hypocrisy that is your so called sinlessness.
Rom. 5: 6-8.
You are correct, I don't see that as the one baptism. Here's why.
In the first chapter of 1 Cor. when Paul is talking about baptism, what kind is it?
In chapter 10 when he talks of baptism, what kind is it?
When these Corinthians believed, what kind of baptism did they receive?
I believe it to be water in every case. So why would the Corinthians believe 12:13 is talking about spirit baptism?
I suggest to you this is what that passage means. When they believed and were water baptized in the name of Jesus they were added to the body as we see here.
Acts 2:41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.
And they should all be in harmony.
Most of Paul's letters come after he finished his travels. The letters he writes to those he and others converted should agree with what he taught and how he converted them.
Aquila and Priscilla were taught by PAUL for over a year and a half... that is why they could "expound unto him the way of God more perfectly".I could point it out but I'd rather you read it for yourself and not take my word for it, Acts 18:24-28.
If you don't want to challenge your understanding that's fine, but if you're going to shoot down my understanding I need more proof than "I said so".
So your desires are to please yourself? You have to force yourself to put the Lord first in your life?
I find that quite telling. Hardly a change of heart.
Of course the Lord would agree with you on that?
You think Paul didn't built precept upon precept as the Lord gave him revelation?
You are correct, I don't see that as the one baptism. Here's why.
In the first chapter of 1 Cor. when Paul is talking about baptism, what kind is it?
In chapter 10 when he talks of baptism, what kind is it?
When these Corinthians believed, what kind of baptism did they receive?
I believe it to be water in every case. So why would the Corinthians believe 12:13 is talking about spirit baptism?
I suggest to you this is what that passage means. When they believed and were water baptized in the name of Jesus they were added to the body as we see here.
Acts 2:41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.
So your desires are to please yourself? You have to force yourself to put the Lord first in your life?
I find that quite telling. Hardly a change of heart.