freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Hogwash
Hogwash
This hodge-podge diatribe response doesn't address the valid points I made, neither are they an intelligence response except to marginalize and ridicule. In your effort to claim 'mumbo jumbo', you manage to produce quite a load of it yourself, which doesn't do much at all to support or ennoble your presentation, neither your 'theology'. Nice try, but no cigar. My statements hold.
Hogwash
:think: I'll bite: :doh: says a 'human' who makes different statements, under different circumstances, worse...however...than these biblical authors :noway: and is subject to bias, incredibly blatant with his own imperfections, malconditionings, poor literary devices that serve this blatantly sacrilegious malcontent. lain:
You are a borg, however. You are the cookie-cutter punch-out of the mindless borg drone.
malconditioning isn't actually a word, but it phonemically sounds okay, entomologically looks okay. "occurances" is not. Why can't borgs spell? Oh yeah..."ALL" relative... lain: (this isn't about spelling...its all about being unnecessarily and lacking being blatantly relative about truth when it mattered).
It isn't where John Lennon got material for "Imagine." Acts 4:12 John 14:6 1 Peter 2:4 I don't think you have to be a rocket scientist to understand the clarity. At that point, your listening skills are a point of 'convenience.'
lain: "Truth is truth" is redundant and poor definition. It is essentially meaningless and flavorless. No truth can be relative or it is, by definition, no longer true, but then of course, you randomly said 'truth is truth' for definition. :nono:
Try: ideal, essential, consistent, correct
Cliché spiritual beings aren't aliens from other planets. This is 3-dimensional thinking. The UB folks were stuck there.
No great stretch? Opinionate and speculate for life application much? My advice: "You play Russian roulette and Borg-make-believe on your own dime."
GROSS jump from speculation to not even a sustained conclusion from said gymnastics. It isn't even gymnastics that you could computer simulate, so far is it removed from your speculative premise. It is merely excusing behavior of cognitive dissonance.
:yawn: Looked, again :sigh: and never impressed :nono: No idea why you even think such could be on par with scripture. It can't. lain:
View attachment 24270View attachment 24271
:think: View attachment 24272
:dizzy: Hallucinogens? John Lennon had that excuse. Child of the 60's?
This hodge-podge diatribe response doesn't address the valid points I made, neither are they an intelligence response except to marginalize and ridicule. In your effort to claim 'mumbo jumbo', you manage to produce quite a load of it yourself, which doesn't do much at all to support or ennoble your presentation, neither your 'theology'. Nice try, but no cigar. My statements hold.