freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
dealing with issues properly informed......
dealing with issues properly informed......
I don't think I ever claimed it did. All sharings are subject to investigation. What I write is free for anyone to accept or reject, or interpret as they like. That's kinda how information works
You apparently don't understand what is meant by a 'fragment' of 'Deity' indwelling the mind of mortals. That's why the resource-links were provided you. Until you learn the terms, meaning and context of what a 'thought-adjuster' is, you're in the dark, and can only continue to presume and misrepresent.
Sorry, that blanket statement for 'christians' is a bit presumptuous, as I've taken on many a traditional Christian in my time More 'precise'? ah, I guess you can tell that to every 'christian' of the many dozens of 'denominations' out there, in the potpourri of theology out there,...yea....pretty 'percise' :noid:
That's according your religious imagination,....this 'satan' character which has NOTHING to do however with your education on the function and role of a 'thought-adjuster'. Try again. - (u know ole slewfoot gets blamed for too much as it is eh?)
Another ridiculous claim, which you'd have to offer proof for,...as much as you'd need to offer proof that the Bible alone is somehow the inerrant, infallible, perfect and final 'word of God'. Again, that puts you back in 'subjectivity-ville'
Since you fail to meet the requirements for an at least elementary discussion on the subject here,...you are rendered inept that much,...but that could be remedied with a better education on matters. So,...looks like a stale-mate,...and your 'stuck' in your same 'positioning' from the very first of this thread,....which is going around in the very same circle.....over and over and over.
So it goes...
pj
dealing with issues properly informed......
Because you state something or subscribe to a viewpoint doesn't make it Truth.
I don't think I ever claimed it did. All sharings are subject to investigation. What I write is free for anyone to accept or reject, or interpret as they like. That's kinda how information works
God doesn't fragment Himself.
You apparently don't understand what is meant by a 'fragment' of 'Deity' indwelling the mind of mortals. That's why the resource-links were provided you. Until you learn the terms, meaning and context of what a 'thought-adjuster' is, you're in the dark, and can only continue to presume and misrepresent.
We Christians do too, but it seems we are more precise.
Sorry, that blanket statement for 'christians' is a bit presumptuous, as I've taken on many a traditional Christian in my time More 'precise'? ah, I guess you can tell that to every 'christian' of the many dozens of 'denominations' out there, in the potpourri of theology out there,...yea....pretty 'percise' :noid:
No, I'm not ignoring Satan, I just recognize when he shows up.
That's according your religious imagination,....this 'satan' character which has NOTHING to do however with your education on the function and role of a 'thought-adjuster'. Try again. - (u know ole slewfoot gets blamed for too much as it is eh?)
In the Urantia book it's every word.
Another ridiculous claim, which you'd have to offer proof for,...as much as you'd need to offer proof that the Bible alone is somehow the inerrant, infallible, perfect and final 'word of God'. Again, that puts you back in 'subjectivity-ville'
Since you fail to meet the requirements for an at least elementary discussion on the subject here,...you are rendered inept that much,...but that could be remedied with a better education on matters. So,...looks like a stale-mate,...and your 'stuck' in your same 'positioning' from the very first of this thread,....which is going around in the very same circle.....over and over and over.
So it goes...
pj