The authority behind the UB created the principles that these great men you cite merely discovered. You talk as if they invented them and due homage should be paid. Maybe they should appropriately credit God for that which already existed and they merely observe????Show me one example from your arrogant and thieving book where an established scientific principle is attributed to the scientist who discovered or developed it. Just to get you started, I can tell you that the names of the three most significant contributors of the past two centuries in each of physics, chemistry and biology, Einstein, Rutherford and Darwin, do not appear anywhere in it.
It arrogantly and thievingly fails to attribute their their brilliant work to them, and insults the risks they took in the pursuit of knowledge that benefits us all.
That reflects poorly on the character of every person who quotes it.
Shall I lift paragraphs from your posts and attribute them to the Sesame Street Cookie Monster?
Stuart
What about the late "discoveries" which were already reveled in the UB but science is only now realizing? Urantia Foundation does not demand credit for those things.
The science in the UB is in some cases totally different then currently accepted norms.
"Einstein denied several times that black holes could form. In 1939 he published a paper that argues that a star collapsing would spin faster and faster, spinning at the speed of light with infinite energy well before the point where it is about to collapse into a black hole. This paper received no citations, and the conclusions are well understood to be wrong. Einstein’s argument itself is inconclusive, since he only shows that stable spinning objects have to spin faster and faster to stay stable before the point where they collapse. But it is well understood today (and was understood well by some even then) that collapse cannot happen through stationary states the way Einstein imagined. Nevertheless, the extent to which the models of black holes in classical general relativity correspond to physical reality remains unclear, and in particular the implications of the central singularity implicit in these models are still not understood. Efforts to conclusively prove the existence of event horizons have still not been successful, and most scientists acknowledge that no such proof is even possible"
The Forum at Dr. Saddlers studied dark islands and dark gravity bodies in the 20’s and 30’s, long before Einstein even had a chance to deny them.....which he was subsequently proven wrong!!!!!!!!
"The dark Islands of Space. These are the dead suns and other large aggregations of matter devoid of light and heat. The dark islands are sometimes enormous in mass and exert a powerful influence in universe equilibrium and energy manipulation. The density of some of these large masses is well-nigh unbelievable. And this great concentration of mass enables these dark islands to function as powerful balance wheels, holding large neighboring systems in effective leash. They hold the gravity balance of power in many constellations; many physical systems which would otherwise speedily dive to destruction in near-by suns are held securely in the gravity grasp of these guardian dark islands. It is because of this function that we can locate them accurately. We have measured the gravity pull of the luminous bodies, and we can therefore calculate the exact size and location of the dark islands of space which so effectively function to hold a given system steady in its course."
=
=
=
"On the outskirts of this vast central universe, far out beyond the seventh belt of Havona worlds, there swirl an unbelievable number of enormous dark gravity bodies. These multitudinous dark masses are quite unlike other space bodies in many particulars; even in form they are very different. These dark gravity bodies neither reflect nor absorb light; they are nonreactive to physical-energy light, and they so completely encircle and enshroud Havona as to hide it from the view of even near-by inhabited universes of time and space."
The UB expands on evolution far beyond Darwins theories.
Scientific validation can be found here:
http://www.ubthenews.com/index.htm
Caino