is Jesus God?
is Jesus God?
Jesus (Christ Michael) is the Son of God, a creator Son. He is unified with the Father. Yes, to all intents and purposes, Jesus is God to us.
We must go through the Son to know the Father.
Caino
is Jesus the only Son of God?
Note:
In the UB the Trinity is the creator of the creator sons. Jesus therefore was not the second person of the Trinity, he is a son of or creation of the Trinity.
There are many other divine beings, all unified with the Father.
Caino
The Urantia Book
Paper 119
THE BESTOWALS OF CHRIST MICHAEL
http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1371
Game show hosted by Stephen Fry. It deals in reality, not fantasy stories mixed up with plagiarised pre-1950 science.
Stuart
Game show hosted by Stephen Fry. It deals in reality, not fantasy stories mixed up with plagiarised pre-1950 science.
Stuart
Thanks for your input freelight. We may also point out the reasoning for the revelators use of our linguistic forms, they speak a far different language then we do, were they to have used their own language structure then much would have been lost. They stated that they dramatically dumbed down the new concepts presented but went on to say that they had faith in the spirit which indwells man to be able to form the thoughts, meanings and values which they were attempting to communicate to us.
C
?How does the Urantia Book describe the term, Qi?
What a cozy mutual admiration society this is. You insult intelligent people everywhere by countering valid accusations of plagiarism with fatuous quotes attributed to imaginary beings. Are you both four years old??
The science it did get right it stole without credit to the scientists who did the actual work, and the much of it is just plain wrong because the science of the 1950s is not necessarily current. Obviously.
I suggest the two of you grow at least one conscience between you and stop spewing you're lame nonsense over the one area of human endeavour that has benefited you the most of any.
Or else give back your car keys and antibiotics.
Stuart
Show me one example from your arrogant and thieving book where an established scientific principle is attributed to the scientist who discovered or developed it. Just to get you started, I can tell you that the names of the three most significant contributors of the past two centuries in each of physics, chemistry and biology, Einstein, Rutherford and Darwin, do not appear anywhere in it.Stu,
I've provided a long sampling of the source parallels. Anyone with any intellectual honesty can see that there is no more plagiarism then one writing a book report on a book they read; similar terms and word groupings would be expected. That’s not plagiarism. And if you feel that it is then be the first to bring a law suit. No one else has.
Several examples of scientific validation have been given to you but your to angry and proud to concede.
Caino