musterion
Well-known member
"Those who believe in Christ" are all the Christians, Catholic or not.
No.
"Those who believe in Christ" are all the Christians, Catholic or not.
Not so.
Could you please clarify this. Are you saying the church has power to forgive sins?When the Body of Christ has it in her power to forgive her individual members their temporal debts incurred when they sin. No one but God can forgive eternal debts.
I can show you where it is forbidden in Scripture. On none of the pages, in no verses, no books, and no chapters. Like indulgences, infant baptism does not disobey/conflict with/contradict a single jot or tittle of Scripture.
You have more in common with God's Truth than anyone on this board.
What do you think the Council of Trent's anathemas?
Wide is the gate that leads to destruction.
What's the harm in discussion?
You think we're fools. We think you're a fool. At least one of us is right but either way, endless arguing with fools is discouraged in the Bible (which you're selective about believing). I guess I'll make the call for us both and put you back on ignore.
You're right. He isn't even a bit player. Politically he's basically impotent, and has been for quite some time.You're about as ignorant as my left shoe!
He the leader of 1.2 BILLION Catholics who reside in basically every nation on the planet and he controls more money that you can comprehend.
He's by no means on par with the President of the United States or the Pime Minister of England but he's certainly no bit player either.
Give me an example, and we'll together see if it's something that those interested in purchasing political power would find attractive.The pope has no influence over citizens of other countries?
lol
Give me an example, and we'll together see if it's something that those interested in purchasing political power would find attractive.
You're right. He isn't even a bit player. Politically he's basically impotent, and has been for quite some time.
For example many American Catholics vote 'pro-choice' Democrat. The papacy's position has been that abortion should be outlawed. So if he can't even get Catholics to vote right, then I can't imagine why you would think that he is powerful.
Do you?Could you please clarify this. Are you saying the church has power to forgive sins?
That would conflict, if and only if the Church teaches that baptized infants are all set, and aren't required to believe the Creed once they arrive at the age of reason.It does conflict scripture.
16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Does an infant believe?
I don't think y'all are fools. Even Paul was wrong at one point. I just see the holes in your reasoning and trying to point them out. All I want to do is help.
If you put me on ignore, please don't take me off.
Show me how this otherwise hypothetical political influence manifests. As I pointed out, it doesn't even compel American Catholics to vote 'pro-life.' How easy should that be, if the popes possess this 'immense political influence?' All these Catholics have to do is fill in one circle on the ballot instead of the other, and half of them can't do it. It looks a lot more like Catholics are politically influenced by a coin flip, than by the papacy, in the ballot box.If one is an actual Roman Catholic then the pope has immense political influence over them.
So that's funny because, the pope actually Is very powerful? :liberals::rotfl:
They don't vote "pro-life" (which, if we're being honest, isn't really pro-life at all anymore) because the Pope isn't really pro-life.Show me how this otherwise hypothetical political influence manifests. As I pointed out, it doesn't even compel American Catholics to vote 'pro-life.' How easy should that be, if the popes possess this 'immense political influence?' All these Catholics have to do is fill in one circle on the ballot instead of the other, and half of them can't do it. It looks a lot more like Catholics are politically influenced by a coin flip, than by the papacy, in the ballot box.
I would strongly suggest this is your problem.
You're taking an unfair approach to how Christians WERE CONVERTED.
You're looking at the meat Paul is giving to people who have already been converted to prove your view of conversion. People were only given milk to be converted.
1 Cor. 2:2 And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. 2 For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.
Milk
God has seen fit to give us about 12 conversions in scripture. Probably about half of those are Paul's. Why not use those conversions to understand HOW Paul made someone a Christian that he then later writes to?
Then when reading his letters, keep in mind HOW those people he is writing to were converted. I suggest your approach is backwards.
So that's funny because, the pope actually Is very powerful? :liberals:
Then are you willing to debate baptism?