SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
How'bout that - yuh bin re-luh-gaited tuh the status o "thee other poh-stir."
See wut-chuh-git fer that uh-thir gah-spoh?
Hyuk, hyuk...
IP claims to have me on ignore, but I know better...
How'bout that - yuh bin re-luh-gaited tuh the status o "thee other poh-stir."
See wut-chuh-git fer that uh-thir gah-spoh?
Hyuk, hyuk...
IP claims to have me on ignore, but I know better...
Then again, Mr. Greek supposedly has me on ignore also. So perhaps he'd meant "another; which is not another"
He has you, saint john w the great, and STP the Adequate all on ignore.
I suspect that Jerry Shugart is next.
Since Acts 2:41 does not use the word "water" regarding baptism, the reference to baptism is not referring to "water baptism".
What does the context tell us about what kind of baptism is being referred to? Acts 2:38 "be baptized... in the name of Jesus Christ"
the name of Jesus Christ is far more powerful, cleansing, empowering than any amount of H2O could ever be.
Since Acts 2:41 does not use the word "water" regarding baptism, the reference to baptism is not referring to "water baptism".
How are you doing on #436 Jerry?
:french:Has Jerry answered about denial yet? Does he understand denial--that you can't deny/suppress unless you ALREADY KNOW.
Has Jerry answered about denial yet? Does he understand denial--that you can't deny/suppress unless you ALREADY KNOW.
IP needs to prove denial first. IP is confused. IP needs a padded room.RD, disprove it.
Jerry would chew you up and spit you out in a debate.
And to you, this is a pronouncement of "good news"?As IP pointed out how is it Jerry , D.T.S., and YOU missed this ?
Act 2:23
Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
And to you, this is a pronouncement of "good news"?
WE know that the cross it good news because God revealed it TO and THROUGH Paul.
Peter is giving a MURDER INDICTMENT.
You START with "only one good news" and then FORCE (or try to force) the Bible to confirm your false assumption.It was the fulfillment of prophecy as you know one of many that those in MAD deny exist:
Isa 53:5
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
There is it again the ONE Gospel.and with his stripes we are healed
As IP pointed out how is it Jerry , D.T.S., and YOU missed this ?
Act 2:23
Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain: