1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
"Half time adjustments?"
What makes you think it might have been half time?
"Half time adjustments?"
Answer the question [MENTION=17235]Interplanner[/MENTION]You didn't even try to answer my simple question. I'll type it more slowly.
Given the rip-roaring start (and that's a fact) of the "great commission" in Acts 2, why did God then bench the Twelve, as far as the Gentile world is concerned, and sent Paul to Gentiles instead?
Oh.What makes you think it might have been half time?
Answer the question [MENTION=17235]Interplanner[/MENTION]
Did God or did they?
It just happened.
They were prob still thinking about the Israel kingdom.
But even so, Peter reflected on what happened and said God sent him to the Gentiles, and James said that is what happened too.
It just happened. They were prob
You tell us.
Oh. It "just happened." Accidentally just happened? Magically just happened? Which commentary gave you that gem. Or is that now your stock answer when you can't answer a MAD's Bible questions, "It just happened."
"Probably"? You mean you don't know and you have no commentary that tells you? Come on, this isn't a hard question. The G.C. was never fulfilled after it had started. Paul's ministry replaced it. Tell us why.
Duh, Peter got sent to a Gentile, yes, we all know that. He'd already been sent, eventually, to Gentiles with the G.C. But THIS time, Peter wasn't happy about seeing Cornelius and was not sure why God sent him even after it happened.
Now answer the question:
Why did Christ send Paul where He'd already said He was sending the 12?
STP, the Bible is nothing but nonliteral probablies, donchaknow. No reason to get all worked up over what no one can say is true or not. The Bible proves nothing.
Except MADs, they're definitely wrong. The Bible proves it.
You assumed God stopped them from their commission, I did not. You also assumed a timestamp. I did not.
As for Peter not exactly liking the job of going to the Gentiles, have you ever read Gal 2? He didn't like it and Paul had to blast him about that. Paul didn't insist on him continuing to try going to the Gentiles, but he did tell him he had mistreated Gentiles and confronted him...
You assumed God stopped them from their commission, I did not. You also assumed a timestamp. I did not.
God sent others (Philip) as well as Paul to keep on the game plan; to bless all nations.
.
Philip never went to a gentile. Show us the scripture were you think that he did.God sent others (Philip) as well as Paul to keep on the game plan; to bless all nations.
You assumed God stopped them from their commission, I did not.
Go ye therefore, and teach ALL nations, baptizing THEM in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching THEM to observe ALL things WHATSOEVER I have commanded you...
Matthew 10:23 (KJV)
The LORD sending Peter to Cornelius was OUT OF ORDER. Something had changed.
I'd almost posted to Musti not to bother with his "why Paul?" question to you; that you'd only look at it from within all that your overall view is based on; which in your case, is your overall distortion.
Sure enough; you did just that.
You're a fool, Interplanner; plain and simple.
Nevertheless, Rom. 5:8.
Is it acceptable to God to eat pork?Must says:
If MAD is totally wrong, then IP should easily be able to demonstrate from Scripture what is true.
That's what the thread 'the NT core doctrine' is there for...
That's exactly what bugged Peter. But IP can't see that.