Congrats and enjoy!I am about to retire
Congrats and enjoy!I am about to retire
You were posting scripture before without the large text formatting.The scriptures have built in fonts that I copy/paste
You are always most welcome in my thread.
Flat earth is as important a subject as any other historical and Biblical topic.
Not only do we have flat earth followers today we also have geocentric believers with us today as well.
All cosmological views should be allowed to be debated here.
Flat earth is the oldest and most enduring of all of them
and the most Biblical from what I know at this point.
I'm personally not emotionally attached to any cosmology, I don't believe it's a salvation issue.
But I do think there are too many here who are very emotionally attached to heliocentrism and that NASA can do no evil.
I would like all my friends, and those who were once my friends, to just chill, relax and treat this subject without passion or prejudice so we can have an enjoyable intelligent debate. I am about to retire and so I will have more time to participate in this and other debates. I think most of us are here because we value and love debate.
--Dave
Patrick Jane's new Flat Earth. He wants to talk flat Earth. We want to keep all the Flat Earth discussion in one place.
Not really.
Unfortunately, though thankfully few and far in-between, and I imagine that there's a correlation (if not causation) between belief in either FE or GeoC and level of education.
You really think hindu cosmology (for example) should be debated on TOL?
It's not, really. It's fairly modern.
If I recall correctly (and correct me if I'm wrong), the model you like the most has the earth as a flat plane that extends to infinity. That doesn't fit this verse:
He sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers, he stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out, as a tent to dwell in. - Isaiah 40:22 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah40:22&version=GNV
Even if it is correctly translated as "circle," because a plane that extends infinitely cannot, by definition, be a circle.
Most don't, afaik.
Kepler and Galileo have nothing to do with NASA. They established that heliocentrism matches what we see going on in the night sky.
Honestly, I'm glad we've had a discussion on this topic, and I've certainly learned a lot, but would I say my position has changed? Not at all. If anything, my position, that God created the heavens, the earth, the seas, and all that is within them, and that he hung the earth on nothing, that He sits over the sphere of the earth, and stretched out the heavens, has been solidified.
Add another fallacy to your list of arguments. Something is not true simply because it is old.That's the whole point of a debate, both sides make their case and others can add to it. Everyone involved becomes more informed and can make up their own mind on the matter.
Flat earth is the oldest cosmology
"The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of Earth's shape as a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat Earth cosmography, including Greece until the classical period, the Bronze Age and Iron Age civilizations of the Near East until the Hellenistic period, India until the Gupta period (early centuries AD), and China until the 17th century. That paradigm was also typically held in the aboriginal cultures of the Americas, and the notion of a flat Earth domed by the firmament in the shape of an inverted bowl...The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC), although most pre-Socratics (6th–5th century BC) retained the flat Earth model."
--Dave
I have been using BibleGateway under KJV for a while now but didn't know it has built in fonts. From what I'm being told I can prevent that and bolding too. So I may still be able to use biblegateway and fix it before I post and the the bold too. But how can I tell for sure if it's ok after I post? So I can either delete the post or try again? AMR or anybody that can help, I appreciate it. I used to type them out in the past but never very many verses. I used to always look them up in my KJV and type after reading from the book. It takes so much time though. I won't enlarge anything anymore.You were posting scripture before without the large text formatting.
Go back to using the scripture software you were using before.
That's the whole point of a debate, both sides make their case and others can add to it. Everyone involved becomes more informed and can make up their own mind on the matter.
When someone on one side or the other refuses to be persuaded NO MATTER WHAT, then it ceases to be a debate and becomes something else, something ugly, uncouth, unrighteousness and unchristian. Christianity ought not be about the pursuit of doctrine for doctrine's sake but about the pursuit of truth no matter the consequences and as such ought to restrict itself to rational discourse and remain open to being persuaded by it. There are those on this thread, and I'm literally frightened that you may be one of them, who would not be persuaded that the Earth was round if someone physically took them into orbit and showed it to them. At the very least they wouldn't be convinced by anything less than exactly that which is not a reasonable burden of proof by any standard. It's as if the flat-earthers don't bother to even think through the arguments against their position. They listen to and accept only that which argues in the affirmative and basically ignore everything else, answering any rebuttals not with rejoinders but with entirely different affirmative arguments.
As for your last post, the fallacy there is known as an appeal to tradition and/or an appeal to popularity - take your pick. The point is that how old an idea is or how many people believed it isn't at all relevant to whether it is true. A lot of people can be wrong for a very long period of time.
Clete
Amos 9 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
God’s Judgment Unavoidable
9 I saw the Lord standing beside the altar, and He said,
“Smite the capitals so that the thresholds will shake,
And break them on the heads of them all!
Then I will slay the rest of them with the sword;
They will not have a fugitive who will flee,
Or a refugee who will escape.
2 “Though they dig into Sheol,
From there will My hand take them;
And though they ascend to heaven,
From there will I bring them down.
3 “Though they hide on the summit of Carmel,
I will search them out and take them from there;
And though they conceal themselves from My sight on the floor of the sea,
From there I will command the serpent and it will bite them.
4 “And though they go into captivity before their enemies,
From there I will command the sword that it slay them,
And I will set My eyes against them for evil and not for good.”
5 The Lord [a]God of hosts,
The One who touches the land so that it melts,
And all those who dwell in it mourn,
And all of it rises up like the Nile
And subsides like the Nile of Egypt;
6 The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens
And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth,
He who calls for the waters of the sea
And pours them out on the face of the earth,
The Lord is His name.
7 “Are you not as the sons of Ethiopia to Me,
O sons of Israel?” declares the Lord.
“Have I not brought up Israel from the land of Egypt,
And the Philistines from Caphtor and the Arameans from Kir?
8 “Behold, the eyes of the Lord God are on the sinful kingdom,
And I will destroy it from the face of the earth;
Nevertheless, I will not totally destroy the house of Jacob,”
Declares the Lord.
9 “For behold, I am commanding,
And I will shake the house of Israel among all nations
As grain is shaken in a sieve,
But not a [c]kernel will fall to the ground.
10 “All the sinners of My people will die by the sword,
Those who say, ‘The calamity will not overtake or confront us.’
The Restoration of Israel
11 “In that day I will raise up the fallen [d]booth of David,
And wall up its breaches;
I will also raise up its ruins
And rebuild it as in the days of old;
12 That they may possess the remnant of Edom
And all the [e]nations who are called by My name,”
Declares the Lord who does this.
13 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord,
“When the plowman will overtake the reaper
And the treader of grapes him who sows seed;
When the mountains will drip sweet wine
And all the hills will be dissolved.
14 “Also I will restore the [f]captivity of My people Israel,
And they will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them;
They will also plant vineyards and drink their wine,
And make gardens and eat their fruit.
15 “I will also plant them on their land,
And they will not again be rooted out from their land
Which I have given them,”
Says the Lord your God.
Footnotes:
- Amos 9:5 Heb YHWH, usually rendered Lord, and so throughout the ch
- Amos 9:6 Or stairs
- Amos 9:9 Or pebble
- Amos 9:11 Or shelter or tabernacle
- Amos 9:12 Or Gentiles
- Amos 9:14 Or fortunes
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Copyright [emoji767] 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation
I'd say definitely, it sums the topic up beautifully. Because we can show many major flaws in the whole moon landing charade, and that means NASA will lie about anything and everything. I have this entire interview on video with and without expert behavioral analysis. It's very telling, plus the raw footage of the paper in the window nobody was supposed to see and the artificial light thy used was seen also, among a litany of debacles that virtually prove they never went to the moon. These images explain a lot. Not to mention the effort to nuke the dome above the earth during Operation Fish Bowl and all the many operations with Admiral Byrd at the helm. Look into Operations High Jump and Deep Freeze for more details.Fine with me. Can we keep it as "The earth is flat and we never went to the moon"?
--Dave
The implication is clear. There is no other reason for you to have brought it up.I never said flat earth is "correct" because it's the oldest, I just said it was the oldest. Then came geocentrism around 300 BC then heliocentrism in the 1500s. A form of heliocentrism is offered at 300 BC but was rejected for geocentrism.
See what I mean? What other possible reason could there have been for bringing it up.Aristotle believed that ships disappearing bottom first was proof of a globe but rejected a spinning and orbiting globe. There was no evidence for movement then just as now "from earth".
The difference is that there are no reasonable arguments for a flat Earth, Dave. It's a delusional conspiracy theory with no basis in reality whatsoever.Clete, you and I have argued against a timeless God and we both think it an absurd, unbiblical, irrational concept but there are those we have argued with who refuse to see what we consider clear truth. But there are many more open view believers now because of our arguments. You nor I think badly about those who are unconvinced of our arguments nor do we think that our opponents are destroying Christianity and sending the naive into eternal hell for believing in a timeless deity. Regardless of how convinced you are of the Copernican universe I hope you won't treat those who are not so convinced any differently than you would those who are not convinced of open view.
I did that!Just remove all "personal" concerns about this topic and put out all those good arguments you're capable of and see how it goes.
Like I said, a delusional conspiracy theory. There's exactly the same amount of evidence that aliens visited the ancient Earth as there is that the Moon landings were faked - NONE!I will continue to defend and argue for flat earth and also see how it goes. I'm not doing this for any "personal" reasons. The only thing I'm personally interesting in is studying all the cosmologies and comparing them, and enjoying the process. It's important for me to find the truth. My complete past confidence in Copernican cosmology has been seriously challenged by flat earth. I never had confidence in the moon missions because I believe they were faked for political purposes. NASA is in my opinion has always been a disguised "space" military organization--Army/land, Navy/sea, Air Force/sky, NASA/space.
--Dave
Flat earth is not a doctrine and it does not have anything to to with salvation. My blessed assurance is intact and my doctrine hasn't changed. I have testimonies on video (short ones) from Christians whose faith was strengthened and unbelievers who now believe in God and Jesus Christ as their Saviour, Personally, I don't know anyone that has experienced the same as me or was an unbeliever and changed or not. I can only believe the written testimonies that I've heard. I may post one short testimony video just to put it out there. The debate is contentious, IMO, partly because flat earthers believe that ALL the evidence presented for a globe does not rise to the level of proof to us.