eider
Well-known member
That's what my dictionary read. I said it disagrees with me.That says NOTHING about the SIZE of a cult.
You can't read .
That's what my dictionary read. I said it disagrees with me.That says NOTHING about the SIZE of a cult.
Slowing changes that have been happening for millennia, by focusing on phenomena that have been happening for a couple centuries.Again, the majority are focused upon slowing the changes ...
Again, the majority does not establish the truth. That you cannot answer any of those questions shows that you do not understand the problem.Again, the majority are focused upon slowing the changes, reducing the speed of sea level rise.
Proof-read so that you look like less of an idiot.But a newspaper. Read it.
It was irrelevant. A lot like you.That's what my dictionary read. I said it disagrees with me.
You can't read .
But you think you know all about it, eh?Again, the majority does not establish the truth. That you cannot answer any of those questions shows that you do not understand the problem.
I love your insults!Proof-read so that you look like less of an idiot.
I'd say that I'm more qualified than you.But you think you know all about it, eh?
What science qualifications have you?
Thanks, you should.I love your insults!
One favourable for our flora and fauna.Again, what is the "proper climate"?
Then warmer is better.One favourable for our flora and fauna.
Arctic, temperate or tropical?One favourable for our flora and fauna.
In modern English, a cult is a social group that is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or by its common interest in a particular personality, object, or goal.Well, my dictionary disagrees with me
Cult: a system of religious worship, excessive admiration for a person or thing .
So please yourself what you think.
Try 'cleaner', with a more stable temperature.Then warmer is better.
I was using the 'Little Oxford', which one are you using?In modern English, a cult is a social group that is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or by its common interest in a particular personality, object, or goal.
Not sure if the definition is acquiesced...
It was an encyclopedia entry, so a bit more in-depth, which doesn't mean right, but does discuss definition in more detail. It does help, especially if they are right that a more modern grasp of the term is beyond religious meaning, and more broadly 'gathering around an idea and goal.' While we really are polarized on topics, sometimes just getting agreement on semantics can go a long way to at least grasp and understanding. Sometimes it can lead another to say: Oh, in that light, I agree and/or side with you.I was using the 'Little Oxford', which one are you using?
Sometimes, by association, the threads become a bit surreal. I'm trying to somehow tie glaciers and covid together and can only come up with:Try 'cleaner', with a more stable temperature.
But, at least you are not in denial over the fact that the glaciers are retreating, the ice caps reducing, and so sea levels will be rising. At least you can see that it is happening.
And has been for thousands of years before the industrial revolution.At least you can see that it is happening.
I think the point is, we should end the industrial revolution, freeze to death in the winter, return to the ice age and all wear 17 masks.Sometimes, by association, the threads become a bit surreal. I'm trying to somehow tie glaciers and covid together and can only come up with:
" Glacial temperatures kill covid." Through a bit of purposeful naivety, I may have managed to miss the point
Obama must be "in denial" as he has purchased a house right on the coast. Or maybe Obama just knows the truth.Try 'cleaner', with a more stable temperature.
But, at least you are not in denial over the fact that the glaciers are retreating, the ice caps reducing, and so sea levels will be rising. At least you can see that it is happening.
He'll be ok.Obama must be "in denial" as he has purchased a house right on the coast. Or maybe Obama just knows the truth.
In engineering, that's called a WAG... the projected rise ...
... the projected rate
Why does the temperature need to be "stable"?Try 'cleaner', with a more stable temperature.
I never deny facts.But, at least you are not in denial over the fact that the glaciers are retreating, the ice caps reducing, and so sea levels will be rising.
Yes, and I actually understand why. I understand that there is no existential threat caused by man-made actions. The world will not "end in 12 years".At least you can see that it is happening.