No, they didn't know it was wrong, they were told it was wrong ... there's a difference.
They knew it was wrong after they were told, which was BEFORE they committed the offense or else there would not have been an offense - by definition.
Satan told Eve something else and not knowing good from evil she went with it and so did Adam.
Well there's your opinions and then there's God's own word. The whole of Romans 5 is false if what you say is correct.
Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come. 15 But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man’s offense many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many. 16 And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but the free gift which came from many offenses resulted in justification. 17 For if by the one man’s offense death reigned through the one, much more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.)
18 Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life. 19 For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.
20 Moreover the law entered that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more, 21 so that as sin reigned in death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
You keep trying to invent ways that God didn't really mean what He said to fit the dictates of your "logic".
Saying it doesn't make it so.
This is a sentence that belongs at the BEGINNING of an argument. Simply making a claim doesn't count as either an argument nor a rebuttal.
I don't understand that inclination. He said what He meant and He meant what he said. How's that for a "premise?"
I have no idea what you're even referring to. Please try to make a complete point.
I do not deny that God meant what He said, I deny that He meant what you say He meant.