I’m not sure why I always have to teach trinitarian how sabellianism
It has been noted that this Greek term homoousian ("same being" or "consubstantial"), which Athanasius of Alexandria favoured, was also a term reportedly used by Sabellius.
The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.
- Thread starter f.y.i
- Start date
It has been noted that this Greek term homoousian ("same being" or "consubstantial"), which Athanasius of Alexandria favoured, was also a term reportedly used by Sabellius.
OZOS
Well-known member
You have no clue who God is, or what it means for God to be in Christ.
| THREE QUESTIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE TRINITY IS BIBLICALLY TRUE OR FALSE. If any one of these questions can be answered 'no,' then the Trinity can be rejected as an unbiblical belief. But if all three can be answered 'yes,' then the concept of the Trinity can be accepted as true. 1. Does the Bible mention three distinct persons? 2. Does the Bible refer to each of these persons as God? 3. Does the Bible teach there is only one God? The answers: 1. Are three distinct persons mentioned? YES. A. The Father (1 John 3:1) B. The Son (1 John 1:3) C. The Holy Spirit (John 14:6; 14:26; 15:26; 16:13-14; Romans 15:30; Ephesians 4:30) 2. Are each of these persons referred to as God? YES. A. God the Father (1 Thessalonians 1:1) B. God the Son (John 1:1; 20:28; Hebrews 1:8-9) C. God the Holy Spirit (Acts 5:3-4) 3. Is there only one God? YES. (see Deuteronomy 4:35-39; Psalm 86:10; Isaiah 45:5; 45:22) |
FOR ANYONE WHO REJECTS THE TRINITY AS BIBLICAL:
Please show how the verses provided do not answer in the affirmative all three questions asked.
So
| THREE QUESTIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE TRINITY IS BIBLICALLY TRUE OR FALSE. If any one of these questions can be answered 'no,' then the Trinity can be rejected as an unbiblical belief. But if all three can be answered 'yes,' then the concept of the Trinity can be accepted as true. |
You’re using the inspired scripture to verify a post biblical concept by using a outside source and terminology disingenuously and anachronistically, as if those biblical characters knew what you are referring too . They don’t .
Right Divider
Body part
There is no such thing as "post Biblical". Something is either Biblical nor not.
It seems like you have a mental condition. Please seek immediate medical attention.
You have yet to establish that the concept of God being "tri-une" is, as you call it, "post-biblical."
Also, what outside source am I using? Certainly not the Bible...
Also, @f.y.i please learn how to format your posts properly. If you need assistance, please don't be afraid to ask.
Here a example of post biblical. Jesus Christ never used the NT or any bibles with chapter and verses . So your whole spiel is a uneducated guess from someone who to lazy to think think for himself.
Right Divider
Body part
That is stupid. Some of the BIBLE was not complete during Christ's time on earth. That is no problem for me.
That is stupid. Some of the BIBLE was not complete during Christ's time on earth. That is no problem for
There is no such thing as "post Biblical". Something is either Biblical nor not. ^^^
Right Divider said:
There is no such thing as "post Biblical". Something is either Biblical nor not. ^^^
Right Divider
Body part
Gross ignorance on your part.
Seem you agree Jesus Christ never used a modern day version. The point being he went to the house of Israel with what inspired writing copy of copies scrolls
.
Right Divider
Body part
Jesus is God. He inspired ALL of the authors of scripture. Including those that came after His ascension.Seem you agree Jesus Christ never used a modern day version. The point being he went to the house of Israel with what inspired writing copy of copies scrolls
You do know Jesus Christ was inspired by the God of truth who taught him . His Father who he revealed.
“I have much to say about you and much to judge, but he who sent me is true, and I declare to the world what I have heard from him.” They did not understand that he had been speaking to them about the Father.
Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God.’ But you have not known him. I know him. If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and I keep his word.”
John 8:26-27, 54-55 ESV
https://www.bible.com/bible/59/jhn.8.26-27,54-55.esv
Right Divider
Body part
Jesus claimed the SAME authority as His Father. In other words, He is God.
Character as a Son who begotten of the Father . Not the other way around.
Right Divider
Body part
A Son and His Father have the same nature (i.e., God).
Why do you ignore so much scripture (i.e., the Bible)?
The LORD shall place HIS FEET on the mount of Olives. This is also referred to in Acts 1.
A Son and His Father have the same nature (i.e., God).
You’re really pleading . Get real .