Well, I don't know you and my problem was with a claim to facts on his part not in evidence. It's one thing to begin that way if you have them and can produce them (though I'd always argue production at the outset is best) and another to make a claim without them.
As to your difficulties with Catholicism, I'll let you two hammer that out. I don't share your belief about his church, though I'm a Presbyterian, but it doesn't have anything to do with my entry into the discourse, so...
Else, if you deny the divinity of Christ then by the orthodoxy of every major part of the Body within Christendom you're a heretic and outside looking in. I'm not saying that sums you, because we haven't had a discussion on it and I'm unfamiliar with your position. I'm only offering that to be clear on my position in relation to his second statement.
I do NOT deny the divinity of Christ!!! That would be denying the divinity of GOD! HE was holy, HE became the holy Son of God and HE in HIS resurrected holiness sets on HIS throne in heaven with the Father. HE declares what is holy and that is also honored as holy by me.
Example - Gen.2:2-3, Lev.23:2. Christ kept them and the Apostle Paul also kept them after the cross and we are to follow Paul as he followed Christ. 1 Cor.11:1
I do strongly deny the divinity of the pope or any other man or so called saint "icon" they bow before.
How about you?