Summit Clock Experiment 2.0: Time is Absolute
- Thread starter Bob Enyart
- Start date
We can just accept that time is a non-physical entity. Therefore, if you measure it, the measure is a representation of the distance between the events, with the distance assumed to be incapable of change.
This seems reasonable given that there are only two events and only one truth about the nature of the distance between them.
If we consider two events, can the time that separates them change?
Let us say event A is the pitcher releasing the ball and event B is the batter hitting it and we measure the time between the events as 0.8 seconds. Can that time change?
What? :AMR:
1=1. Do you agree?
If we consider two events, can the time that separates them change?
Let us say event A is the pitcher releasing the ball and event B is the batter hitting it and we measure the time between the events as 0.8 seconds. Can that time change?
TimLutz
New member
Supposedly does depending if you are approaching or retreating from the event in an accelerating or decelerating velocity. Pretty nuanced tho. Q, whatta the hecka doe this connect to theology? God is organized and created. all the is from nothing ( interesting formula that). And it is recorded how He had manipulated time/space and matter ( walk on water and pass thru walls. Always say that we live in a special type of echo. However our small intellect can wrap around a multidimensionality Being that resides at all points of time is pretty steep.
Posted from the TOL App!
Posted from the TOL App!
So if two people -- each at separate velocities -- are watching the same pitch, there will be two instances of the ball being hit?
Or do you think it is more reasonable to believe that the measuring techniques are affected by the velocities (or, more accurately, the different gravity environments)?
And do you think, rather than there being different times, that the discrepancies between measurements can be reconciled with a calculation?
Relativity is not nuanced, it is self-contradictory. A simple understanding of the universe is nuanced when you accept that there is only one instance of each event and one distance between them, but the measurement of the events and the measurement of the time between them can give varying results according to the conditions.
For one thing, the ability to rationally describe reality is a good indicator that a theological discussion might be worthwhile.
TimLutz
New member
TimLutz
New member
Sorry hard to read on smart phone. We sold our windows machines. Will crank up my nook for a better look. But am still digging for the best math model for you to counter.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference
Posted from the TOL App!
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference
Posted from the TOL App!
TimLutz
New member
Ok this should help.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c5
So if you have an anti thesis formula equal. That would be nice to see.
Posted from the TOL App!
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c5
So if you have an anti thesis formula equal. That would be nice to see.
Posted from the TOL App!
I don't think inertia is an issue because in each case there is no gravity other than what is provided by the two masses.
Did you read my link?