Hi Dan. Well, sir, if "only the original autographs are inspired", then you (like most Christians today) are professing a faith in a Phantom Bible that you have never seen, never read, can't show to anybody else and that you KNOW does not exist. Yet you use a present tense verb - ARE - when you tell us that something that does not exist "ONLY the ORIGINAL AUTOGRAPHS ARE inspired!"
And you "Phantom bible" guys think us King James Bible believers are whackos???
If there is a translation of the Bible that is without error then it is NOT the KJV.
Here we read in that translation that the "feast of unleavened bread" happened prior to the Passover:
"Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?" (Mt.26:17; KJV).
Here we can clearly see that this translation reveals that the "first day of the feast of unleavened bread" preceded the Passover.
However, the "feast of unleavened bread" always took place the day AFTER the Passover, not before it:
"These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread" (Lev.23:4-6; KJV).
The Passover began on the 14th and the first day of the feast of unleavened bread was on the 15th. Therefore, the first day of the feast if unleavened bread did not precede the Passover, as the following translation from the KJV has it:
"Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?" (Mt.26:17; KJV).
The word "day" and the word "feast" were mistakenly added to the text.