death2impiety said:
I'm trying to keep the discussion going. I am interested in your viewpoint. I am for swift, brutal execution. It appears that you are for swift, comforting execution. I don't see why an advocate of the death penalty would want it to be a "kind" death. You believe the guy should die right? You believe it should deter right?
What is a better deterrent? Knowing you'd be brutally stoned or knowing you'd be forced to submit to painless lethal injection?
An answer of they'd both deter the same would be acceptable if that's what you actually believe.
Stoning is
not swift, although the brutality it's got. Why do you favor a "swift" execution, anyway? If your intent is to scare the daylights out of your victim why not make it brutal and slow? Beheading is swift and brutal. Do you favor beheading? A shotgun at point blank range is swift and brutal. You favor that? Why do you think "swiftness" is so important?
Wouldn't a slow, agonizing, hideous execution be an even BIGGER deterrent? Yes or no.
And if you don't want executions to be kind, well, you know where that leads us...
By that rationale, screw stoning! Let's burn people alive, all over again. Let's put them on the wheel. Hell, man, let's just start crucifying people all over again. Stoning? For chumps. Screw stoning!
Crucify him. Brutal, long, agonizing. Now there's a heck of a deterrent. We'll flog you, then nail you to a piece of wood. Or break your bones and spool you on a wheel. Or cut you to death like the Chinese and Japanese used to do.
Questions for the class that I'd appreciate a straight answer to:
You ever seen footage of a stoning?
Who still stones people?
Why should execution be "swift"?
Why should execution be "brutal"?