The global flood is an actual event as well. The models are attempts to (same). Massive amounts of force are needed to produce what is now here, but not massive amounts of time. R x T = P.
And you know this how?
The global flood is an actual event as well. The models are attempts to (same). Massive amounts of force are needed to produce what is now here, but not massive amounts of time. R x T = P.
And you know this how?
Evidence.
'Has anyone said otherwise...' I put my response that way to get your attention. You sound like I'm not talking about the same place.
so you admit to recognizing that creationism is science?
good :thumb:
As you know...creationism are beliefs about the past and don't contribute anything to science.
ironic, ain't it?
Indeed. Is Creationism science, or is Creationism not science? I wish creationists could make up their minds.
You have a messed up idea of what science is.Indeed. Is Creationism science, or is Creationism not science? I wish creationists could make up their minds.
You have a messed up idea of what science is.
Nope. I mean evidence.And when you say "evidence" you actually mean faith, right? (Hebrews 11:3)
Why shouldn't we?If science can prove it, why does anyone have to have faith?
Because we have faith.If science can't prove it, why should anyone believe it?
Yeah, you should figure that out before you try to contribute to threads like this. :up:What is science?
What is science?
Yeah, you should figure that out before you try to contribute to threads like this.
sci·ence
ˈsīəns/
noun
noun: science
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
Feel free to answer the question. :up:
That is one kind of science.sci·ence
ˈsīəns/
noun
noun: science
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
What is science?