Bociferous
New member
Hi Lon,
Sorry but a great deal of your post was incoherent. You posted quotes from both me and AMR and while it seems most or all of your responses were to me, it's hard to be sure. A couple of your comments are worth a response anyway.
Sorry but a great deal of your post was incoherent. You posted quotes from both me and AMR and while it seems most or all of your responses were to me, it's hard to be sure. A couple of your comments are worth a response anyway.
I have no idea what you're talking about--if the above was to me, your disconnect from coherence is startling. I hold Paul in higher esteem than any of the other apostles. Using passages as arrows to shoot at someone else is method--poor method, but method all the same. Building the complex of multiple points necessary to build epistemological warrant for a belief is methodology. If you took the time to learn what methodology I use you wouldn't make such off the wall statements.Your rejection of Paul makes your 'feel the love' fairly clear, though
This comment is amazing in light of the fact that even a casual reading of the gospels show that AMR's position--no new ground is to be had in theology, we are to adhere to tradition--is one of the most common postures adopted by the Jewish religious leaders against the upstart Jesus. They refused to judge Him according to honest criteria for truth, but instead judged Him by their own traditions as though these were truth itself as per Mat 15:1-6.It is very strange to see Pharisees scapegoated today by every cult and cult-minded. It is excuse-looking and trying to condemn Christ's body the Church.