An important friend of mine has let me know that the Governor has called in The National Guard:
I wonder if they've consulted CW and her gleaming THall.
One would certainly think so....
An important friend of mine has let me know that the Governor has called in The National Guard:
I wonder if they've consulted CW and her gleaming THall.
You would be surprised at the amount of foolish Americans that think JFK was also shot from the front when the bullets all exited the front. Or maybe you would not be that foolish. People let emotion get in the way of facts all the time.
I think I'm following you so far, but it's been a few years since I read something in vague racist. Do go on.I would not jump to conclusions on this deal. My husband got a hold of a cell phone video, where someone was speaking to another person...Now I am paraphrasing what I remember, because it was actually in ebonics
That would be English, unless you're being ironic.and I am trying to translate and make sense of the broken english,
Can you charge someone tentatively?but the gist of the matter is that Brown was charging the officer in a relentless way.
When you see a police officer beating or shooting a citizen, is your first reaction to sympathize with the officer, or the citizen?
I don't know much about the original incident that sparked these riots but I am going to assume it was wrong doing by the officer shooting an unarmed man.
However....
That doesn't excuse these rioters and looters. They should be handled like any other rioter or looter.
I think 95% of these folks are just using it as an excuse to steal, and destroy property.
They need to become bankers so they can steal trillions and get fat with bonuses, yet the anger of the trained citizens always get all indignant over fellow slaves reacting to their zombie existence caused by the corporate bottom line. Oh try not using the legal name and get the revelation your slavery is deeper than you even want to consider, or admit to yourself.
6 bullets? That's not righteous, that's overkill.
Did you really think you were going to get an honest answer from Connie?
Just another excuse for the jb's to loot liquor stores.
Because he knows that if he uses the unabbreviated term he'll be banned.What would the reason be that he won't just tell everyone? Why did he even abbreviate it in the first place? What is he afraid of? aCW insults, argues with and alienates almost everyone here, all the time. So why this time is he running away from telling everyone his mind?
We have been here, before, in this country, and we had bloody riots in the streets. Back then, the citizens were forming unions, and fighting against police thugs who were paid by the wealthy elite to keep the 'rabble' in line.What do you suggest?
Learn to read.......before you show yourself to be a retard......
Originally Posted by Christ's Word
It is nice to know your husband approves of your lies and your[/B] drooling over other men (birds of a feather).
One has to wonder why you would feel the need to make up something about someone you don't know and will never know?
Or why you would feel the need to apologize to only one of the three people you have disrespected...
Or why you would feel the need to apologize to only one of the three people you have disrespected with your lies?
Since when does appreciating equate "drooling" or being made hot? You need to keep it real. I am sure you feel so honored when your husband makes remarks about how attracted he is to another woman? You can lie to yourself, but you won't fool me, or any other Christian who understands the Covenant of marriage.
Because he knows that if he uses the unabbreviated term he'll be banned.
Maybe, but I don't know. There's no shame in saying "I don't want to get banned"
And abbreviated profanity is as bannable an offense as profanity. Folks get banned for implied profanity all the time. The admin doesn't seem to care about this. Maybe they haven't noticed. Or maybe it will catch on at TOL. "The jb's."
"The governor called the national guard in because of the rioting jb's."
That reminds me, they must be exploding about all of this over at Stormfront.
Are you aware that (Saint) Michael Brown punched Officer Darren Wilson in the face and attempted to take his service weapon when Officer Wilson got out of his patrol car, which is the reason Officer Wilson rightfully shot Brown?
Nope, and you aren't, either. That's not what some bystanders say, and until we get it sorted out, no one knows for sure. You're just presenting your hopes as fact.
Speaking of which you never did tell us what you meant by "jbs." I suppose even you have some sense of shame.
Says the Devil's daughter who is too busy to drool over men she is not married to? Did you get tired of embarrassing yourself and your husband and honoring your father the devil?:nono:
I would not jump to conclusions on this deal. My husband got a hold of a cell phone video, where someone was speaking to another person on scene trying to describe what just happened. You can hear the voices in the background as the video shows Brown lying motionless in the street. The voice said something like, "the cop shot at him and missed, and he kept coming at him and coming until the cop finally got him in the chest and then in the face and he went down".
Now I am paraphrasing what I remember, because it was actually in ebonics, and I am trying to translate and make sense of the broken english, but the gist of the matter is that Brown was charging the officer in a relentless way. IF this is true, and there are no bullets in Brown's back, this is good for the officer and horrible for the citizens of St. Louis, expect more rioting and the rage expressed to increase.
It's not. If he doesn't fall on the first shot, keep shooting. Besides you can only be killed once, so there is no such thing as overkill.
lain:
Is that a shock?Well the right likes to talk long and loud about "freedom" and "liberty" but the Fox News crowd's been cheerleading the cops for the most part. If you're okay with the militarized response you have no complaints living in a police state.
Does anyone think that Mike Brown would not have had an incident with the Police that day if he:
Didn't do a strong arm robbery earlier that day?
Wasn't walking in the middle of the street?
Hadn't tried to attack the Police officer and take his weapon?
What racial excuses are put forward for Black on Black crimes?
If you are a Black man you have a greater chance of another Black man committing a crime against you than a Police officer, any outrage over that?
nope, but attacking a police officer and trying to take his weapon :doh:Christian Liberty
Nobody is defending Mike Brown. He was in all likelihood a thief. That in and of itself isn't just cause for him to have been killed.