ICameBack
New member
Let's be fair, Chryso hijacked it. My advice was perfectly relevant, but regardless, it does indeed illustrate what this site's about. And I imagine that our debate would be relevant to his interests.
Indeed. As you were
Let's be fair, Chryso hijacked it. My advice was perfectly relevant, but regardless, it does indeed illustrate what this site's about. And I imagine that our debate would be relevant to his interests.
There's still missing pieces, admittedly, but I find it no different than your lack of explanation for God's existence.
.
our belief in God explains the missing pieces
Yes, but the existence of God is in itself a missing piece. You may be able to fill in what's missing from the scientific understanding of the Universe's creation, but you're ignoring the fact that God himself has no explanation whatsoever.
The evidence against Him seems huge, but I lay my last vestiges of hope in you guys (not to sound dramatic).
Wait a minute. Who said the Universe isn't Eternal? Of course it is.There's still missing pieces, admittedly, but I find it no different than your lack of explanation for God's existence.
If we needed God to exist, where did he come from? If the Universe can't be eternal, why can God? If the universe can't come into existence, why didn't God have a creator?
So, I'm a high schooler of abnormal thinking
The evidence against Him seems huge
So, I'm a high schooler of abnormal thinking, and have found it more and more difficult to believe in God, especially the one of the Bible.
Read:
1. Meno
2. Phaedo
3. Symposium
4. Phaedrus
5. Republic
6. Confessions
7. De Magistro
8. Monologium
9. Proslogium
10. Cur Deus Homo
1-5 are by Plato
6-7 are by St. Augustine
8-10 are by St. Anselm
Have your mom order these books immediately.
Until you've read every page, you can't even begin to know how "evident" God's existence is.![]()
What, no Aquinas??![]()
No. St. Thomas Aquinas is too hard, and I really don't think that St. Thomas Aquinas is going to convince anyone. :noid:
Good point. How about Aristotle, then?
Sounds to me like the Abrahamic God is the one he is rejecting. No doubt. You have to get deep into study of Scripture and metaphysics before that makes any sense.You'll definitely see a full spectrum of Christians here, so maybe you'll find what you're looking for. I'm a pagan who keeps coming back to TOL to mix things up. I'm obviously not the one to turn to in order to strengthen your faith in the Abrahamic God, but I wish you well.
Sounds to me like the Abrahamic God is the one he is rejecting. No doubt. You have to get deep into study of Scripture and metaphysics before that makes any sense.
But why reject Jesus Christ and the Gospel of Love, Light, forgiveness and Eternal Joy, I am not sure.
Maybe they forgot to tell him that part.
If you still think this then you are simply misunderstanding what is actually meant by God, but your time on TOL should have made that clear. Lennox does a nice job with this question imo.
So the reason God can be eternal but the universe can't is because... God is eternal? Come on now. I'm a little above that in my thinking. It's not practical to say "God doesn't follow the laws of physics because he exists outside the laws of them" because he STILL had to exist from somewhere.