I always assumed breaking a link meant changing a link to not match to the proper link, which would require me to edit my post which would not have an effect on the quotes.
For it to disappear from all posts without all posts being edited I would think it would have to be deleted at the source.
Well funnily enough I would think the same thing LH, so who deleted it at the source? Let me guess, you don't have any idea right?
You never said what you'd put up in that wager.
And to me wagering is a betting term. But it's useless because it can't actually be proven to you one way or another.
Okay, I'll change my avatar if I can be proven to be wrong, else you make the parameters.
Though apparently that's not 'possible' anyway so nevermind...
And as we've already established that which takes place, including the special privileges we may or may not have is none of your business.
But I gave you a straight answer when I told you that none of the staff have ever said anything about a multiplication of rep points awarded to those we rep while in there.
Oh, I could care less about what is talked about behind the scenes anyway, though it would be more of a straight answer if you categorically denied your rep power isn't increased or subject to changes in SOOTS which the usual member simply doesn't have. Can you do that, without lying?
I know there are some benefits because I have been made aware of said benefits. But really other than being allowed in there and thus privy to certain information and having more leeway than you, for instance, I can't really think of anything else that Knight has openly set forth as a benefit for being a part of it.
So your rep is exactly the same power in SOOTS as it is in public forum then? Just a yes or a no would suffice.
Eh? You don't remember? You were there at the time LH. Rep scores years ago ran into multiple millions...and the rep power reflected it...it was getting crazy all ends up.
Well, apparently that particular poster decided to go on one, but other than that type of thing I don't know what you would mean by that.
Well, they didn't say they were 'going on one' exactly anyway...and how can you say you don't know what I mean by that if you say this particular poster decided to 'go on one' anyway? :idunno:
Why wouldn't we be dispensing it in there as well? We clearly are as I have received some. My friends like what I have to say. What of it?
Well, a thread "about" rep that's in it's fourth incarnation would more than suggest it's the most appropriate place to hand out reps. I mean please....don't try and say you talk about rep so much it's on it's multiple thread LH. Stop insulting people's intelligence. It's not like some folk's exponentially increased scores in such a short space of time via "apparent" use of the regular system hasn't gone unnoticed by plenty on this forum. It's impossible to do.
Three times? Really? Why would Knight do that?
Why not? It would hardly be the first forum to use such measures and the reps were weighted back when I first joined. Why do you think RATO even came about? As sad as it all got the rep system was hardly being equitable and that was the result.
I was explaining that it would have to more than decuple in order to be in the thousands.
Er, not at triple + normal strength it wouldn't and certainly not if the normal barriers of public forum rep spreading were lifted also. You'd very easily escalate quickly.
And as far as my current points and power you have no idea how many reps I have received or from whom over what period of time.
Indeed, but I've seen your score shoot through the roof along with others where it would simply be impossible to do so with any regular use of the system.
I didn't prove anything as everyone already knew it existed and the rest is your imagination.
Well, SOOTS was hardly a secret no, but SOOTS rep thread IV gave enough away to confirm suspicions already well in place. It hardly took much imagination to suss out what that was for...