:chuckle:
another great post by stp
:chuckle:
another great post by stp
Where have you been my friend? Eating?another great post by stp
Where have you been my friend? Eating?
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism
see what augustine had to say about this
back to
the apocalypse
Secular history isn't what the scriptures are teaching.
we are talking about prophecy
the visions of the apocalypse are not in chronological order
THEORIGINALBIBLELOOKEDLIKETHIS
SOWEHAVETOASSUME
THEONESWHOADDEDCHAPTERANDVERSE
KNEWWHATTHEYWEREDOING
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism
see what augustine had to say about this
back to
the apocalypse
without recapitulation the apocalypse cannot be understood and you are forced to put everything into the future
-also-
you might believe babylon falls just before the second coming and the thousand years follows that
-it is not easy being a futurist
:chuckle:
Sounds like a harebrained scheme.
I know you are against work
-but-
if you do the work -
you might find something in history that fulfills a reasonable interpretation of prophecy
I am not willing to leave out 90% of the details of a prophecy to make it "fit" history.
just give me one specific detail
Atta boy!I am not willing to leave out 90% of the details of a prophecy to make it "fit" history.
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism
see what augustine had to say about this
back to
the apocalypse