Sonnet
New member
That would be a non-sequitur in respect of what I actually wrote.
But even if we assent to original sin, then, even though a baby would be held guilty of it, it would not matter since Jesus has provided for all.
That would be a non-sequitur in respect of what I actually wrote.
No, you're just not getting it is all.
God chose His beloved before the foundation of the world- just as the beloved Christ.
This is where we respect the fact of God's omniscient will, and stop treating Him as a mere mortal person.
Point is it can't be held guilty or God would not be just.
and stop treating Him as a mere mortal person.
Perhaps you treat Him as a mere mortal since you don't think Him capable of efficacy whilst actually creating real creatures with real, nonpredeterminded, responses.
The new birth from above is by revelation as Jesus spoke of it to Nicodemus, i.e., by the Holy Spirit that creates within one a hunger
You are a Calvinist, or a Lutheran.for union IN Him Who is the Author of all three parts, "Knowledge, Assent, and Trust". In that is the "components of True faith" made perfect. . .they work as One.
Jesus is called the Lion of Judah because you are a sheep- there is nothing you can do without His willing it.
God's Providence is selective.
The Gospel will reveal itself to you eventually.
Or not
Ok - not sure how this relates to what I said though.
What Jesus has done by his death was to give all mankind access to the Presence of God without the Glory of God slaying him. This same access, though a gift, can only be made effective by the resurrection life of Jesus Christ indwelling man: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6 (KJV) A baby has no choice in this because he isn't able to make one.
I wrote this:
Even if we allow that God knows the counterfactuals of what a stillborn baby would have become - the problem remains for the Calvinist to explain accountability where no recourse to salvation is available.
As AMR said, 'not able to not sin.' Quite simply, those not elect have no way out of their predetermined end.
I am not evangelizing...though if an unbeliever is encouraged by my posts then that's ok.
Right.
What is you view of original sin?
I want to be like youYou forgot John 3:17 KJV!
No. Adam was not confirmed in his state. He failed the probationary period of the covenant entered into with him, "do this and live". Had he obeyed in this covenant of works God would not have instituted the covenant of grace, "live and do this", under which we all labor now. Adam being made good does not mean he was made with moral perfection, he was made mutable. Adam still needed to be confirmed in his righteousness and was placed under probation for that reason.When finished His creation, if God said "everything was good" and only God is good, I think we can safely say Adam was confirmed upright, don't you?
Since the stillborn child is held to be guilty of original sin, then their only hope for salvation would be if Jesus died for them.
That's correct isn't it?