Sonnet
New member
Reprobation is without remedy because God decrees it and therefore, irreversible. , ,even by Him.
I think the definition I'm using is different.
Reprobation is without remedy because God decrees it and therefore, irreversible. , ,even by Him.
Read again what you said.
You said it.
This is complex and I'm not totally following you.
Larger than himself?
Not indwelt by the spirit?
Degree of glory?
If I said the law of our flesh is more powerful than doctrine we learn, even from God Himself, that calls us up to something higher in Him, how do you believe you would handle things when tempted to gratify yourself.
Well I'd say this is our depravity.
is it total?
Well I'd say this is our depravity.
Well I'd say this is our depravity.
Depravity we are given to overcome? I doubt that. I rather believe that because we aren't depraved is the reason for such a battle. Certainly, if we were there would be no battle.
But you do agree that we don't overcome by works of righteousness don't you?
No, I don't. Though works of righteousness is to follow faith we are not saved by those works of righteousness, nor could we be because our righteousness does not meet the standard for our salvation, seeing as how we were conceived in sin.
I understand . . ')There may be a continuing issue with definitions here.
If it merely competes we should, of ourselves, be able to win out.
Here is the key to winning God never interferes in because He is looking for allegiance and when He looks for it it will always be along the line of our being tempted by it, with Him only looking on but not interfering: "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15 (KJV)
Even Jesus was subjected to such aloneness when in His temptations. What kept Him that we need to learn?
Depravity we are given to overcome? I doubt that. I rather believe that because we aren't depraved is the reason for such a battle. Certainly, if we were there would be no battle.
I certainly agree that man is depraved - and the older one gets, the more evident this becomes - but I don't see that you have substantiated that faith requires 'moral ability'.
Can you?
If lost man is depraved, and he is, the lost man possesses no moral ability in and of himself to choose wisely, the choice of the righteousness of God. If man possesses the ability to choose without any help from the Holy Spirit, then man is in control, and God is made a debtor to man's wise choice, rewarding said choice with eternal life. God is not a contingent being, dependent upon the actions of those He created.I certainly agree that man is depraved - and the older one gets, the more evident this becomes - but I don't see that you have substantiated that faith requires 'moral ability'.
Can you?
Half correct. Romans 1 teaches us that all the lost have replaced the truth of God with a lie. No exceptions are made, as you are trying to import in the above. Those among the lost that believe become believers by the regenerative working of the Holy Spirit (Eze. 36:26). Regeneration first. Faith and repentance second.Indeed , the unbeliever is without excuse because God has evidenced Himself to the unbeliever that, as you said, DOES NOT require a 'gift of faith' to understand. Ergo, everyone starts out on the same footing, i.e., KNOWING there is a God. The ones who continually wilfully reject Him; who no longer wish to retain Him in their thinking after being provided understanding, He turns over to reprobation. That is what Romans 1 tells us.
Reprobation is without remedy because God decrees it and therefore, irreversible. , ,even by Him.
Of course, everyone else is wrong but you. Beware of the minority view. It is subtle and tempting to one's pride. The church militant has spoken on these matters and when you find yourself outside the camp, that should signal careful treading. There is nothing Calvinistic in the link in question so attempting to poison the well with the usual anti-Calvinist canards hints you do not know wherein you speak.Odd duck, my foot! You are the one full of contradictions.
The OT saints were indeed saved by grace, however, at that point in time was God's grace, the amount extended to righteous man, limited insofar as it could NOT effect man beyond the grave, the abode of the dead, Abraham's bosom, Sheol. If it could have there would have been no reason for the shedding of the blood of Jesus Christ. So what is your definition of Redemption if I am not correct in this?
This link is full of error except to the Calvinist, who needs to believe it to suppport his religious non-life:
http://www.gotquestions.org/Old-Testament-salvation.html[
Feel free to discuss the full counsel of Holy Writ on the matter of the moral state of the non-believer:Cherry picked misapplied verses of scripture chosen to make fit a religious bent. Damnable to the ones who do so.
Put on some glasses and re-read without skipping over the Scripture cited:Show one scripture that shows God saves UNBELIEVERS!
Do it now or concede.
It is quite simple. The depraved are deceitful and desperately sick (Jer. 17:9); full of evil (Mark 7:21-23); not able to come to Jesus unless given to by God (Eph. 2:2); must be quickened by God (Eph. 2:4-5); cannot choose righteousness until regenerated (Titus 3:5); love darkness rather than light (John 3:19); unrighteous, does not understand, does not seek for God (Rom. 3:10-12); helpless and ungodly (Rom. 5:6); dead in his trespasses and sins (Eph. 2:1); by nature children of wrath (Eph. 2:3); cannot understand spiritual things (1 Cor. 2:14); and slaves of sin (Rom. 6:16-20).Is your definition of 'depraved' the same as mine?