ECT "Rebellion against Pauline authority"

[SaulToPaul 2]

You are an Alcazarianist in denial.

He doesn't want the whole household of God filled up with God's glory (earth, city, heavens).
Satan has the same desire.

 

[musterion]

Because he's a Holfordian Alcazarianist.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Because he's a Holfordian Alcazarianist.

And one that tells spirtitual lies when he spiritualizes.

 

[musterion]

And one that tells spirtitual lies when he spiritualizes.

Yeah, but because they're spiritual lies they're not really lies. They're lies that convey deeper hidden truths.

That's probably the warped internal logic.

 

[steko]

And one that tells spirtitual lies when he spiritualizes.

....which reveals a disquised katasarkian disposition.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Yeah, but because they're spiritual lies they're not really lies. They're lies that convey deeper hidden truths.

That's probably the warped internal logic.

Holfordians have some nerve trying to rewrite God's promises to suit their desires.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

....which reveals a disquised katasarkian disposition.

Indeed, and without combobulation we are lured further away from the NHNE event and the lighted camel of Gen 24:64 when we fail to properly attribute the proper attributes of the paradigm against the backdrop of the former treatise. Agreed?

 

[musterion]

Holfordians have some nerve trying to rewrite God's promises to suit their desires.

Well, if they're willing to dismiss the literal Words of Christ as figures of speech because they don't comport with the Holfordian paradigm viz Alcazar, nothing surprises.

 

[Crucible]

Well, if they're willing to dismiss the literal Words of Christ as figures of speech

'Context' is king- 'literal' interpretation never did and never will hold any weight.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

'Context' is king- 'literal' interpretation never did and never will hold any weight.

:chuckle:

 

[Crucible]

:chuckle:

Does ~The Chuckler~ think context, the most fundamental rule of interpretation, is secondary to mincing words into arbitrary absurdity?

I don't even know what you all are talking about, I just dropped random insight :chuckle:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Does ~The Chuckler~ think context, the most fundamental rule of interpretation, is secondary to mincing words into arbitrary absurdity?

I don't even know what you all are talking about, I just dropped random insight :chuckle:

:chuckle:

 

[steko]

Indeed, and without combobulation we are lured further away from the NHNE event and the lighted camel of Gen 24:64 when we fail to properly attribute the proper attributes of the paradigm against the backdrop of the former treatise. Agreed?

There shall only be spurtial camels in the NHNE.
You can't see 'em but you can still smell 'em.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

There shall only be spurtial camels in the NHNE.
You can't see 'em but you can still smell 'em.

Can spiritual camels go long periods without spiritual water?

 

[steko]

Can spiritual camels go long periods without spiritual water?

Yes, that's one of the things that Holfordian sophisticats haven't fully understood.
It all has to do with the camel's pneumafactor versus the psuchefactor.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Does ~The Chuckler~ think context, the most fundamental rule of interpretation, is secondary to mincing words into arbitrary absurdity?

I don't even know what you all are talking about, I just dropped random insight :chuckle:

Y'all ONLY have "789 Thanks?" That makes you look kinda unpopular, pardner.

 

[musterion]

'Context' is king- 'literal' interpretation never did and never will hold any weight.

Spoken like an Augustinian.

 

[Danoh]

Spoken like an Augustinian.

And he's even off in that - we're now in September, headed for October :chuckle:

 

[Interplanner]

You are an Alcazarianist in denial.

Is this responding to the previous post about the return to the land in modern Judaism?

 

[musterion]

More Holfordian subterfuge. You're in denial.