some other dude
New member
:idunno:
What do you think, Stipe?
I think you're doing what you do best - dodging.
You care only to discuss what a "literalist" would say.
Why not read the verse and tell us what the bible says?
No.Yes or no.
The water in Genesis 1:2 is the "deep". Which is upon the surface of the Earth.I also told you the orthodox take on it, wherein the solid dome of the sky is just figurative. One more time; stop dodging and tell us which you think it is.
Is it a literal solid dome holding the Sun and stars, with water above them, or is it not?
The water in Genesis 1:2 is the "deep". Which is upon the surface of the Earth.
The firmament created in v6-8 is within that water.
The fountains of the deep are formed when the firmament ruptured.
What you think is of no consequence. Where was the water that the firmament was created within? What does Genesis 1:2 say?I don't think that Heaven is the same thing as the Earth's crust.
"Heaven" has a small range of meanings. Perhaps you should go look them up. Perhaps you should find out how many heavens there are. Perhaps you should consider possibilities instead of sticking blindly to your current position. :thumb:Wouldn't God know that much?
What you think is of no consequence.
Where was the water that the firmament was created within?
"Heaven" has a small range of meanings.
Perhaps you should go look them up.
Perhaps you should find out how many heavens there are.
Perhaps you should consider possibilities instead of sticking blindly to your current position.
And the things that I say, which you ignore, are important to this conversation. I've had the same conversation with others and it takes them but a few posts to understand.What God says is of considerable importance.
What solid dome of the sky? Read the second verse of Genesis 1 and tell us where the water is.Literally, above the solid dome of the sky. Just above the Sun and the stars.
Different firmament. This one is qualified as the firmament "of the heavens". As opposed to the firmament in vv6-8 which is the one called Heaven. "Of the heavens". "Called Heaven". There's good reason to believe there is a deliberate distinction. Not least being it frees us of having to read a cartoon cosmology into the bible.Genesis 1:[16] And God made two great lights: a greater light to rule the day; and a lesser light to rule the night: and the stars. [17] And he set them in the firmament of heaven to shine upon the earth.
He says He put the sun and moon in the firmament of the heaven. He most likely used that phrase to distinguish this firmament from the one earlier in the chapter.God says the "firmament" is the Heaven with the Sun and moon and stars in it.
And the things that I say, which you ignore, are important to this conversation. I've had the same conversation with others and it takes them but a few posts to understand.
What solid dome of the sky?
Read the second verse of Genesis 1 and tell us where the water is.
Gen. 1:[2] And the earth was void and empty, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God moved over the waters.
Genesis 1:[16] And God made two great lights: a greater light to rule the day; and a lesser light to rule the night: and the stars. [17] And he set them in the firmament of heaven to shine upon the earth.
Different firmament. This one is qualified as the firmament "of the heavens".
As opposed to the firmament in vv6-8 which is the one called Heaven. "Of the heavens". "Called Heaven".
There's good reason to believe there is a deliberate distinction. Not least being it frees us of having to read a cartoon cosmology into the bible.
God says the "firmament" is the Heaven with the Sun and moon and stars in it.
He says He put the sun and moon in the firmament of the heaven. He most likely used that phrase to distinguish this firmament from the one earlier in the chapter.
Which firmament are you referring to?Stipe, the "firmament" is not the crust of the Earth. It's the sky.
OK.Doesn't say where they were. One could infer that some water was on Earth.
Show us how it cannot. If the waters were upon the Earth and the firmament was created within the water then the firmament is upon the Earth. Thus it is reasonable to test the idea that the firmament called Heaven was the crust of the Earth that was broken up by fountains and shaken during the flood.Show us where it says "the firmament" applies to the Earth.
Show us how there has to be only one firmament. There is more than one heaven. :idunno:Show us where it says there is more than one firmament.
Which firmament are you referring to?
Is there anything wrong with making that assumption?
Can you tell us what is wrong with assuming that the firmament was created within the water and that the water in question was solely on the Earth?
Show us how it cannot.
If the waters were upon the Earth and the firmament was created within the water then the firmament is upon the Earth.
Thus it is reasonable to test the idea that the firmament called Heaven was the crust of the Earth that was broken up by fountains and shaken during the flood.
Show us how there has to be only one firmament.
There is more than one heaven.
Barbarian - you need to show a little humility and grace. You need to acknowledge that this man disagrees with your assessment and look at the details from his point of view in order to deconstruct them.Barbarian observes: Stipe, the "firmament" is not the crust of the Earth. It's the sky. The one in Genesis. The one God calls the Heavens. The only one He mentions. It's not an assumption. Genesis says there's water above and below the firmament of Heaven. How do we get water above the moon and stars, Stipe? How do you convert that to a literal history?
It might be you that is mistaken, but how would we ever know, right?Here is a list of verses ...Show us any that you find convincing evidence for the idea that God was mistaken to call the firmament "heaven."
Barbarian - you need to show a little humility and grace. You need to acknowledge that this man disagrees
It might be you that is mistaken
but how would we ever know, right?
Perhaps if you just read this through and notice the possible distinction between the two places where firmament is used:
So, Barbarian - the challenge is clear. Show us why it is unreasonable to believe that the firmament in vv 6-8 is distinct from the firmament of the heavens in vv9-14.
Explain to us why the author felt the need to use distinctive phrasing.
It's called a discussion. There are two parties involved.
No, it's not the same thing.One says "the firmament is heaven." The other says "the firmament of the heavens." Same thing, slightly different phrasing.
You can read Hebrew now? :noway:Show me in the Hebrew that they are different.