some other dude
New member
These threads always amuse me by their ability to so clearly demonstrate the pathological irrational hatred some posters here have of Bob. :chuckle:
Jukia,
If Pastor Bob's understanding of science is tenuous, then you should be able to refute them rather easily. I have the debate. Would you like me to present one of his arguments for you to refute?
Tom
I learned my lesson with the manganese nodules several years ago. Just surprised he still has the nerve to bring it up.
CiK: Welcome to the List of Not So Old Things! As Chris' friend did not understand, the purpose of this list is to demonstrate that many arguments employed as evidence of "millions of years" in reality each undermine that position. Things claimed to form slowly form rapidly; things that should no longer be here are. Etc.I agree. These are not easy sciences to conquer. However I am willing to give this Mr. Enyart a chance and view some of his material. I don't have much of a head for science, to be honest, but I do find it interesting.
Johnny, if I recall Jukia was a Yates Denier, and you were a Yates Doubter. As I added to the opening post of the Manganese Nodules thread (link there):
To discredit this report, the atheists and evolutionists posting in this thread have unreasonably doubted and even denied the existence of Dr. Yates (like they've done because of their bias and against all reasonable interpretation of the evidence with Pontius Pilate, King David, Jesus, Nineveh, the entire Assyrian empire, Sodom and Gomorrah, etc.). In the meantime, thanks to the ongoing work of Google Books, you can find online a chapter Yates wrote on Deep-Sea Polymetallic Sulphide Deposits in a 2002 text by academic publisher Routledge: Advances in the Science and Technology of Ocean Management.
-Bob Enyart
Jukia,
If Pastor Bob's understanding of science is tenuous, then you should be able to refute them rather easily. I have the debate. Would you like me to present one of his arguments for you to refute?
Tom