Q. What do Christians and Darwinists have in common with one another?

[7djengo7]

He doesn't even understand [the nonsense and falsehood called "the theory of evolution"] even after having [been handed heap upon heap of shamelessly parroted falsehood and nonsensical raving] from [anti-Christian so-called "scientists"] on here, [Alate_One] & [The Barbarian].

Notice that

• Arthur Brain can't even get right the forum handles of his own TOL "scientist" heroes.
• Arthur Brain knows better than to say that he, himself, has "explained" anything "on here". (Though, he sells himself short...or, rather, he sells his "scientist" heroes long, inasmuch as their performances as Darwin cheerleaders on TOL have been as worthless piles of crap as has been Arthur Brain's own performance as a Darwin cheerleader on TOL.)

 

[Idolater]

Setting the repulsive idea aside:

The rest of the world's population is dead, they're wandering around, waiting for their turn to go to eternal paradise, turn out the lights, the party's over.

Why would they think it would be a good idea to repopulate the earth?

If they did, I wouldn't be slack jawed at it. Is all.

 

[7djengo7]

I'm finished trying to talk to you, and I have been since that post.

"that post" a.k.a. the O.P. of this thread--which is to say, you never even started trying to talk to me. You spent the whole time creating straw men, instead.

Anything you say to me after this will indeed be a waste of your time. Have a nice day.

I'll be the judge of what will indeed be/not be a waste of my time.

 

[7djengo7]

I don't claim to be anything.

Which is why you consistently come off sounding like a nobody.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Some denominations allow for evolution and then God creates souls at some point in the evolutionary process.

The idea that a specific woman was made from a rib of a specific man though... allegory.

(Setting up multi-millennia of patriarchy in the process...)

Thank goodness we've moved away from the latter in the most part...

 

[annabenedetti]

If they did, I wouldn't be slack jawed at it. Is all.

Oh, of course not. I mean, everyone knows fornicating with his sister is on every last man standing's bucket list...

 

[Arthur Brain]

Notice that

• Arthur Brain can't even get right the forum handles of his own TOL "scientist" heroes.
• Arthur Brain knows better than to say that he, himself, has "explained" anything "on here". (Though, he sells himself short...or, rather, he sells his "scientist" heroes long, inasmuch as their performances as Darwin cheerleaders on TOL have been as worthless piles of crap as has been Arthur Brain's own performance as a Darwin cheerleader on TOL.)

Hmm, well, that was nice...

:e4e:

 

[Arthur Brain]

Which is why you consistently come off sounding like a nobody.

Oh, but it's still so much better than sounding like you.

 

[annabenedetti]

Oh, but it's still so much better than sounding like you.

You're somebody to quite a few of us.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Oh, of course not. I mean, everyone knows fornicating with his sister is on every last man standing's bucket list...

Mine actually just consists of kicking a bucket, for unfunny comedic value...

 

[Arthur Brain]

You're somebody to quite a few of us.

That depends on the "us" doesn't it?

:cheers:

 

[annabenedetti]

That depends on the "us" doesn't it?

:cheers:

Absolutely! :cheers:

 

[ok doser]

I don't claim to be anything.

of course you do - right here:

No, science has ...

you claim to be a believer in what you think science has to say



and, as we've determined previously, ad nauseum, without any depth of understanding of science

 

[ok doser]

Is there any scenario no matter how extreme where it is not wrong to rape or murder?

Would it be wrong to murder the Son of God if by doing so you helped to fulfill God's plan of salvation for mankind?

 

[Arthur Brain]

of course you do - right here:

you claim to be a believer in what you think science has to say



and, as we've determined previously, ad nauseum, without any depth of understanding of science

"As we've determined previously"?!

You really are a dipstick.

:rotfl:

 

[ok doser]

You've decided that incest can be okay, given the right circumstances.

a 26 year old woman, marrying her 24 year old brother

a 36 year old man, marrying his 31 year old sister


explain clearly and thoroughly why those are inherently wrong

 

[ok doser]

"As we've determined previously"?!

You really are a dipstick.

:rotfl:

:yawn:

yes, that's nice, drunky

 

[Arthur Brain]

Absolutely! :cheers:

It's almost funny isn't it?

 

[Arthur Brain]

:yawn:

yes, that's nice, drunky

Go project elsewhere and make sure you're nowhere near a car.

 

[Arthur Brain]

a 26 year old woman, marrying her 24 year old brother

a 36 year old man, marrying his 31 year old sister


explain clearly and thoroughly why those are inherently wrong

Because it's incest you dimwit. If they were to reproduce then there'd be a high likelihood of congenital defects. Do you even know what that is?