Right Divider
Body part
Well, no. Evolution doesn't "counter" the bible, just a rigid belief system.
And, of course, by "rigid belief systems" you mean actually believing what the Bible says.
Well, no. Evolution doesn't "counter" the bible, just a rigid belief system.
And, of course, by "rigid belief systems" you mean actually believing what the Bible says.
"Slightly"...?
Is there anything in the Bible that you believe is actually true?
Sure. There's no better definition of love than as outlined in Corinthians for starters.
So sweet...
So God's account of creating one man and one woman is a reject for you?
That Adam shows up in TWO detailed genealogies is not good enough for you?
Perhaps the entire Bible is just an "allegory". Perhaps Abraham, David, Jesus, Paul .... all just "allegories".
Young earth creationism can be discarded for the non science that it is.
You just keep begging the question.The allegory is obvious and actual science moves on regardless.
How generous of you.You're free to believe what you want of course but young earth creationism can be discarded for the non science that it is.
Scientifically illiterate moron uses irrational nonsense to declare idea he hates to not be science.
Pictures at 11.
You just keep begging the question.
How generous of you.
Again... Adam is included in TWO DETAILED genealogies that include ALL REAL PEOPLE. Why is ONLY ADAM an "allegory"?
If it were a fact, you would demonstrate it as such. Instead you simply beg the question over and over again.It's not generous, it's just fact.
As are also you free to believe in your favorite myths.You're free to believe what you want.
Again, you make false claims.If you weren't willing to listen to Alate One who explained things to you in painstaking detail, then you're not willing to listen to anyone.
If it were a fact, you would demonstrate it as such. Instead you simply beg the question over and over again.
BTW... it was not generous.... I was being sarcastic. I thought that you'd be bright enough to figure that out. I was was mistaken.
As are also you free to believe in your favorite myths.
Again, you make false claims.
You do not understand much about science at all, but you love to believe what other materialists say about it.
AGAIN... in TWO DETAILED genealogies in the Bible, Adam is listed with REAL PEOPLE. Please address this instead of ignoring it.
You claim that in these lengthy lists.... ONLY Adam is an "allegory".
Again you want to appeal to authority. That's all you know how to do.... make fallacious "arguments".Oh, I realized you were being sarcastic but I simply pointed out that you're obviously free to believe what you want regardless. You'll carry on believing that evolution is some sort of "non science" based on your fundamentalism no matter what anyone says on the subject along with anything else that doesn't fit in with it. Alate One is certainly better versed in science than myself, by a long shot in fact but I do understand how the scientific method itself actually works and young earth creationism simply isn't part of that. If you want to believe that Adam and Eve were two literal people and there was a talking serpent that convinced Eve to eat a forbidden apple then you carry on.
Again you want to appeal to authority. That's all you know how to do.... make fallacious "arguments".
Why do you continue to IGNORE the TWO DETAILED genealogies?
I already know that you cannot address it, but give it a shot anyway.
The scientific method involves formulating theories that fit with the evidence,.
Nope.
Remember how you are scientifically illiterate.
Science is the process of eliminating ideas using logic, reason and evidence. The source and nature of the ideas are utterly irrelevant.
You prefer grand declarations (sans evidence) and appeals to popularity or authority.
It's quite easy to see it as an ethnography, rather than a literal bloodline. Still, won't bother you though will it?
the scientific description of the customs of individual peoples and cultures.
That is quite ridiculous.
Those genealogies are clearly bloodlines.
It's really funny that it was you that was talking about obvious stuff. And then you come up with this cockamamie story.